PR 2.0: May 2008

Monday, May 26, 2008

PR Tips for Startups - The Director's Cut

Note: This post was originally published on TechCrunch as "PR Secrets for Startups." Many thanks to Michael Arrington and Erick Schonfeld for giving me the opportunity to share my experiences with the startup community.

Due to space constraints, the original draft, which was entitled "PR Tips for Startups," did not run in its entirety. Some of the edits actually wound up changing the context of the post and its intentions. I've included the full draft for you here, as I think it's helpful for those entrepreneurs and executives looking to determine whether in house, DIY, or external PR and marketing is best for their company - specific to their current state of growth. Either way, it's intended to help you make decisions in the face of varying outside influences.

This is about your idea, your participation, your success, your community, your relationships with customers, bloggers, press, and analysts, and most importantly, this is about learning and sharing together in order to move forward, informed and experienced - with or without outside help.



PR Tips for Startups

I’ve been overwhelmed with requests from executives and PR professionals to explain how this new media (r)evolution applies to them specifically and how they can make PR more effective and personal during these interesting times. I recently discussed it
here and have been doing so for a long, long time. But since conversations and attention is discontinuous and distributed, I asked if I could bring this discussion to a more prominent online epicenter to help reach a wider array of those looking for answers.

The Long Road Back to Public Relations

Public Relations is experiencing a long overdue renaissance and its forcing PR stereotypes out from behind the curtain where they operated comfortably for far too many decades. It didn’t begin this transformation because of Web 2.0 or the latest Social Media wave, but instead in the 90’s when the Web gained mass adoption. Yes, it’s taken that long and it will continue to evolve over the next decade as communications professionals struggle with putting the public back in public relations.

Regardless of what you think you know about PR and the New Media or Social Media revolution, the truth is that we actually may know less about everything than we actually care to believe. These are times where we can lead and learn in order to improve an industry long plagued by misconceptions and the lack of PR for itself.

PR is now more than ever, something more capable and influential than simply writing and sending press releases to contacts generated by media databases. The media landscape has been completely blown open to not only include traditional media, but also bloggers and most importantly the very people we want to reach, our customers.

PR 1.0

About 100 years ago, Ivy Lee and Edward Bernays created and defined the art and science of modern-day PR. Believe it or not, their philosophies and contributions can be sourced to further evolve PR today – especially when it comes to Social Sciences.

Over the years, the PR 1.0 publicity machine lost its way and its spark. We got caught up in hype, spin, buzzwords, and spam, and forgot that PR was supposed to be about Public Relations. But, its still how many companies continue to approach PR today.

Enter Social Media and the democratization of the Web and content. Now media and content producers are pushing back, demanding a more targeted and relevant form of outreach. For those who confuse Social Media with online marketing, Social Media is anything that uses the Internet to facilitate conversations between people – it is not the practice of social marketing. I say people, because it humanizes the process of communications when you think about conversations instead of companies marketing at audiences.

PR 2.0 = Conversational PR

The Web changed everything and this ongoing reinvention of PR has been dubbed PR 2.0 or New PR.

PR 2.0, as I defined it many years ago, is the realization that the Web changed everything, inserting people equally into the process of traditional influence. Suddenly we were presented with the opportunity to not only reach our audiences through gatekeepers, but also use the online channels where they publish and share information to communicate directly and genuinely.At the very least, PR 2.0 is going back to its roots to bring public relations back to PR.Social Media refers back to the "two-way" approach of PR that Ivy Lee discussed in his day. And, Bernays viewed public relations as an applied social science inspired by psychology, sociology, and other sciences to influence behavior.

Their philosophies combined with the socialization of media creates a new prerequisite and standard for PR professionals.

Now it's about listening and, in turn, engaging influencers and stakeholders on their level. It forces PR to stop broadcasting and start connecting.It is a chance to not only work with traditional journalists, but also engage directly with a new set of accidental influencers, and, it is also our ability to talk with customers directly.

No BS. No hype. It’s an understanding of markets, the needs of people, and how to reach them at the street level—without insulting everyone along the way. Conversational PR is becoming a hybrid of communications, customer service, evangelism, and Web marketing.

The evolution from PR 1.0 to PR 2.0 will result in more informed, effective, and meaningful Public Relations, without a version number. It’ll just be good PR whether it stands for Public Relations, Professional Relations, Personalized Relations, People Relationships, etc.

So what does this mean for you?

It means we have to start thinking about things more intelligently, differently, and personally.

Applying Traditional and New PR Methods for Startups

You’re an entrepreneur with a recently funded company in need of users, or perhaps you’re bootstrapped and actively seeking financing and you need a little something that will land you a more attractive term sheet.

Every VC, as well as every successful entrepreneur, will tell you, great PR can make you, whereas bad or mediocre PR can stifle your growth and possibly damage existing and prospective relationships. And, they all have ideas on how you should proceed.

But right now, the main thing that stands between you and success are users and customers – and good press (traditional and new media) builds the bridge between you and them.

In order to get to the next level, it helps to think about PR strategies and tactics to create a foundation for effective PR, especially in today’s competitive Web 2.0 world.

These are critical times for your business and you can’t simply entrust the future of your brand to anyone who knows how to write a press release, place it on the wire, and send it in email. These tips are designed to provide insight into the PR process so that you can navigate the seas of everything required for creating, implementing, and assessing successful PR programs.

While this may seem like basic common sense or generic PR 101, the truth is that the points I’ve shared are what most company founders and executives usually overlook, or don't know to look for. And, as we all know, common sense is not too common.

#1 - Understand You’re Not the Only Story in Town

Bloggers and reporters are some of the busiest people you could possibly hope to meet. They’re actively looking for the most interesting, relevant, and linkable stories out there, preferably before anyone else can run with it. But truthfully, they spend most of their time hacking through the weeds of generic or over-the-top inbound emails, press releases, Facebook messages, Skypes, SMS, Tweets, and IMs. It’s almost a small miracle that anyone can ever get their story told.

At the end of the day, you’re not the only company with a great story. Just because your story is new doesn’t make it newsworthy. But, that doesn't mean that it's impossible to have your story told either.

Bloggers and journalists are interested in good stories and the more time you spend developing that story up front, for each person you’re trying to reach, the more you can help them help you.

#2 - Pick the Right Person/Team to Lead PR

Your investors or advisors will tell you one of two things, usually starting with “you need PR.” From there, they’ll usually recommend that you either bring on an agency or consultant, one that they’ve worked with and can highly recommend. Or, they’ll suggest that you need to do it yourself (DIY) in order to build relationships with those who are highly respected in your target markets while conserving cash.

While DIY PR initially sounds good, and affordable, you’ll quickly learn however, that it may take more time than you think to reach your influencers and customers. However, any good PR program, whether DIY, in house, or outsourced, will place you in a position to build relationships with the influencers that matter to your business.

If you do decide to hire an internal PR person or team or engage a PR agency, there are some important things to consider. Fortunately or unfortunately, we’re in the throws of the pendulum swinging back in tech marketing, especially in Silicon Valley – regardless of recession fears. Good PR is hard to find and the best are usually booked up. Those who are not as talented are definitely taking advantage of the market conditions and everyone, whether a consultant, agency, or in house PR professional, is going to be more expensive for the time being. Now's the time to get smart about all things PR.

Anyone can write a press release and blast it to a bunch of people. Remember, sometimes you get what you pay for and other times you just get ripped off. So, it’s important that you find the right solution that you can afford, but at the same time, offer the ability to deliver on the results that are realistic to what you need now.

PR people, however, are cutting deals for reduced cash in exchange for options.

When you do meet with PR people, evaluate them based on their ability to tell you succinctly who they have represented and pay attention to how well they summarize each company and what they do. Also quiz them on whether or not they understand the market, tech, benefits and the challenge as it relates to you specifically. Having existing relationships and the ability to show previous results is not optional.

The two most important things to ask a potential PR consultant or agency are 1) do you have the bandwidth required to help us achieve these defined objectives and – if it’s an agency – 2) who’s going to work on my account and if it’s not you, can I meet the others on the team as well.

If you're considering DIY PR, please take a moment to read a great post by Glen Kelman of Redfin.

#3 - You are the Company Brand

You are equally important to the PR process. It only helps if you, in addition to your PR efforts, to introduce yourself to bloggers or reporters offline and online to start building relationships with influencers who will help craft and guide your company across the market adoption bell curve. Read and comment on their work. Send a brief intro email before you need anything. Attend one of the many tech networking events in your area to build your social capital, meet those who can help you, and those who you, in turn, can help as well. Participation is marketing and by actively participating in both the online and real worlds, you forge relationships that will help your brand and social capital grow.

Keep in mind, how you participate online and in the real world also contributes to your online brand – especially in the realm of social media. Comments, social network profiles, blog posts, pictures you share, etc., are all discoverable in traditional search engines and new media search tools.

#4 - Identify Your Markets and the People Who Matter

Observe and document where you are in the state of the technology and market adoption and determine realistic goals and objectives that will help your business get to the next step. This is an especially important part as it will reveal who your customers are and where they go for information.

Now more than ever, it’s important to realize that there is no “one” audience for your story. This is about people. The process of influence is usually a left-to-right process that picks up momentum and mass attention along the bell curve and it fans out in the process.

This step allows us to identify which voices, blogs or media outlets reach the groups of people that matter to you right now and at every step of your growth (you’ll see that it evolves along with your company).

We're not pitching at targets, we're talking to people. And in the era of socialized media, we're learning that conversational PR is far more effective than typical broadcast PR.

#5 - Create a Launch Plan

Pick a news or launch date, say Thursday at 11:30 a.m. PST, and build in a cushion to start talking to the right people under embargo before you roll out. Mondays and early mornings are usually the most congested. Releasing it later will most likely earn greater attention.

A quick note on embargoes and exclusives. Embargoes are a form of sharing news with media where they agree to not publish the news before an agreed upon date/time. Whereas exclusives require that you give your story to one person, and one person only. Choose carefully, as once someone runs with their story; chances are that other newsmakers will pass.

Embargoes and exclusives are not to be manipulated or taken advantage of. Please respect them and the people you’re working with.

Allowing journalists and bloggers adequate time to prepare is critical. They’re busy and they need time to prepare. And, once a press release or the news is made public, no one wants to pay attention anyway.

Determine those reporters and bloggers who should be part of the initial news discussions (under embargo). I’m a HUGE proponent of the "less is more" embargo strategy to try to 1) demonstrate appreciation for those we want to work with - it's different with each type of announcement we feel is truly "newsworthy" as is the audiences it's best suited; and 2) to reduce or eliminate the chance that someone might break the embargo by running early (usually by mistake, sometimes we learn the hard way though.)

#6 - No Two Bloggers or Journalists are Created Equal

Do your homework. Once you’ve identified those whom you’d like to work with before and after the news date, make sure that PR researches individual preferences for contact before they reach out.

This is about relationships and creating a value cycle from PR to bloggers, journalists and ultimately to the people we want to reach with our news. This hopefully isn’t the last time you’ll reach out to them, so work with them, their way, in order to earn the opportunity to collaborate again.

Relationships are cultivated and should be mutually beneficial as dictated by the extra time we take to personalize and package our story and align it with their workflow. Perception is everything. Do the legwork and the outreach that contributes to the reputation you wish to earn and maintain. Anything less takes away from it.

#7 - Determine What Success Looks Like and How to Measure It

Establishing metrics at the beginning is important for setting expectations on both sides as well as establishing the bar for performance. Coverage is important, but no one can ever predict or guarantee whether or not top tier media or A-list blogs will cover a particular story. However, establishing a quantity (based on quality) of coverage to shoot for is healthy, as long as you take into consideration an attrition factor.

PR can also be measured by conversations sparked online due to initial coverage, referring traffic as well as registrations and/or downloads. Analysis and measurement will reveal a path for prioritizing your targets now and in the future.

Be realistic in the number of visitors you establish as a metric. Also, make sure the site’s registration or download process is simple and that the messages around it are short and powerful. PR can bring traffic all day long, but if visitors aren’t reminded as to why they’re there or if the process is at all too cumbersome, the conversion ratio of visitors to users will quickly diminish.

#8- Make the News Newsworthy

I’ve been privy to an uncountable array of company pitches and it never ceases to amaze me just how few can actually summarize what they do and why it matters.

Focus on the elevator pitch and make it compelling, memorable, and relevant. Brevity and customization is key.

Make sure to summarize each news announcement with a couple of statements and bullets to quickly showcase why anyone should care. Package the story differently for each person you’re hoping to reach as each WILL have different needs. Take the time to pull relevant screen shots, create user accounts for each person if necessary, customize video demos and screen casts, and anything else someone may need to write a story instead of having to spend precious time doing your work for you.

Yes, it’s time consuming. But this is about building individual relationships and not about broadcasting spam.

For more on press releases, please read this post.

#9 - Become or Identify an Incredible Spokesperson

As I mentioned before, I’ve witnessed thousands of startup presentations and many are painful to endure. Company founders are naturally enthusiastic and passionate about their product, but unfortunately, that doesn’t necessarily make them the best spokesperson. Not everyone can be Loic Le Meur, Jason Calacanis, Steve Jobs, etc.

First impressions are everything, and publicly showcasing your company, on stage, online, in print, or via broadcast media, requires nothing less than a polished, personable, and contagious presentation.

Take the time to craft your pitch so that it's solid, tight and compelling. As hard as it is to pass the torch, this is one of those times where you really don’t have much of a choice if you’re not absolutely, 100% the best voice of the company. All hope isn’t lost however. Media and presentation training is an inexpensive and painless process. When tied to a tight elevator (or escalator) pitch and convincing messaging platform, you may indeed emerge as the ideal spokesperson for your brand.

More on this subject, here.

#10 - Your Company Blog is More Powerful Than You May Think

I’m sure you’ve all read that having a company blog is critical to maintaining communication with your community.

First, don’t under estimate it. Second, don’t over estimate it. A blog is the voice and the soapbox for thought leadership, vision, solutions, milestones, and advice. At the very least, it contributes to the personality of your corporate brand. The best blogs become a resource and a destination, which helps improve your bottom line. For example, Google’s official blog is number 14 in Technorati’s Top 100 list of popular blogs.

In a world of building relationships with bloggers, reporters, analysts, partners and customers, your strategy simply can’t rely on only contacting everyone when you have news. Relationships require cultivation and nurturing. The company blog can help.

Prior to and in between announcements, make sure you’re out there actively commenting on relevant blog posts. But don’t leave short, irrelevant, kiss ass, or angry comments. Contribute to the value of the conversation and make sure it links back to your blog. Also host relevant conversations on your blog and link out to your most valuable contacts wherever possible. They do pay attention.

Maybe this goes without saying, but I’m going to mention it anyway. Don’t break your news on your blog!

Like press releases crossing the wire, breaking news on your blog makes the news less valuable if others haven’t yet had an opportunity to break it for you first. It’s like the new car analogy. The value of the car drops the minute you drive it off the lot. Time your post for after the news breaks and link to everyone who helped cover the story.

#11 - Bloggers Relations Extends from the “A-List” to the Magic Middle

Online conversations are distributed and it requires PR to now identify the relevant silos that reach valuable mass and niche markets.

The best communications strategies will envelop not only authorities in new and traditional media, but also those voices in the "Magic Middle" of the attention curve. The Magic Middle, as David Sifry defined it, are the bloggers who have from 20-1000 other people linking to them. It is this group that enables PR people to reach The Long Tail and they help carry information and discussions among your customers directly in a true peer-to-peer approach. And, in many cases, these bloggers are your prospective customers. Its effects on the bottom line are constant and measurable over time.

I published a free ebook on this subject if you'd like to continue reading about blogger relations.

#12 - Follow the Conversations and Participate in Them

As much as media and blogger relations drive traffic and increase your user base, we can’t overlook the importance of social networks such as Facebook, Twitter, Pownce, Jaiku, DIGG, Reddit, StumbleUpon, Delicious, Diigo, FriendFeed, Ning, Mixx, Bebo, Get Satisfaction, Google and Yahoo Groups (among many, many others). When executed and managed correctly, and genuinely, the referring numbers can outperform the best articles and posts and the relationships that you create within these networks will prove incredibly valuable throughout the life of your company.

This isn’t about promotion or social network spam. This is about dialog driven by the insight you garner from listening and reading, all driven by people who are talking about you – without or without your direct participation.

This is a post in and of itself, however, just to get started, try searching for your company, product, or competitor’s name in any of the above networks or any other social network, to see how they’re being discussed in each respective network. By researching individual conversations, threads, and/or groups, you’ll find strategic points of entry across the board. This does take time, and may prove too overwhelming for you to run individually. Hiring a community manager or empowering your PR team, is a great place to start, that way they can point you to the conversations that require your attention or handle them directly.

Listening is as important as publishing, and the best listeners make the best conversationalists. Make sure to keep a Google Alert for your company, spokespersons, and products. Reading and responding is critical to managing perception, sharing expertise, and building loyalty.

For more on this topic, read this post.

#12.5 - Answer Customer Service Emails and Calls

My good friends at FreshBooks make this a mandate for every person in the company, from the top, down. Answering questions and hearing concerns and complaints from users firsthand offers a humbling perspective that keeps executives in touch with their customers and their challenges and perception. This ongoing insight feeds back into everything from marketing to sales to service and inspires more accurate, innovative, and engaging outreach.

Other companies such as H&R Block, Zappos, Southwest, JetBlue, Dell, and WineLibrary are among the many (and growing) companies using blogs and social tools to shift the process of customer service from an inbound cost center into an outbound process for cultivating users into enthusiasts.

For more on the subject of Customer Service and Social Media, download the free ebook and also read this two part post I recently contributed for Customers Rock!. Part I & Part II.

Summary

There’s no question, you have to compete for attention and in order to do so effectively and genuinely, you may need someone who can help tell your story, the right way, through the people who reach your customers. However, this post was intended to help you be successful if you choose to lead a DIY PR campaign. It's completely possible to do it yourself too!

It’s not an overnight process and it’s not something to “be gamed.” It’s a process of investing in, building and leveraging relationships now and in the long term. And yes, if you do things the right way, bloggers, reporters, and analysts will want to talk to you about your company and vision along the way – so it’s important that you stay involved in the process of strategic PR.

Create a PR strategy that combines traditional and new media best practices, promotes your vision and expertise, and empowers the people on your team to share relevant and compelling stories specific to the individuals and groups you want to reach.

Build your community through PR and direct participation and remember, this is all about people. In PR, you earn the relationships you deserve.

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Ariel Waldman vs. Twitter, When TOS Doesn't Apply to You


Credit: Ariel Waldman

This is part of my ongoing series on Crisis Communications 2.0, which helps companies and marketing professionals learn from each other to more effectively communicate with customers, stakeholders, media, and peers.

I purposely waited to write this post until this discussion cleared techmeme so that I could reach a fresh set of people who could see things clearly, while also calling attention to something we overlook everyday.

When's the last time you actually read the terms of service (ToS) for any social network you joined?

I think for most of us, we assume that they'll protect us as well as themselves, blah blah blah, and we'll all get along happily ever after.

What happens when the ToS of your favorite service work against you? And even worse, what happens when the ToS you abide by, instead protect someone who's actually using the service to continually attack you personally?

Such is the case currently with Ariel Waldman versus Twitter. Disclaimer: Ariel is the community manager for Pownce, an indirect competitor to Twitter. The following activities transpired before she joined the Pownce team.

For those of us who remember, Kathy Sierra showed us the ugly side of people and their disgusting behavior in online communities. And while Kathy's experience represented the extreme dark side of cyber stalking and online threats, Ariel's experience is not any less important.

For almost a year, across multiple social networks, Ariel Waldman has been the victim of relentless and unnerving personal attacks.

The very things that empower individuals to engage in conversations and cultivate communities in social media also amplify the regrettable behavior we hoped to leave behind in the real world.

In Ariel's case, her cyber-stalker has publicly and directly harassed her on Flickr, Digg, and Twitter. When Ariel alerted Flickr that someone was violating the ToS by verbally attacking her on the network, Flickr responded immediately and removed the offending posts, each and every time, and ultimately blocked the user.

Twitter, a service that is near and dear to all of our cyber hearts, surprisingly, erred on the side of the user allegedly violating the ToS. I find this fascinating, as Twitter's terms of service were inspired by the community-focused spirit that powers flickr (as noted).



Twitter clearly states, "You must not abuse, harass, threaten, impersonate or intimidate other Twitter users."

They also protect themselves with the addition of, "We may, but have no obligation to, remove Content and accounts containing Content that we determine in our sole discretion are unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene or otherwise objectionable or violates any party's intellectual property or these Terms of Use."

After speaking with Ariel, I realized that her motives were undoubtedly clear and unemotional. This was about holding a company to enforce the Terms of Services that they defined and we agreed to follow - nothing less, nothing more.

"It's just not OK to allow this behavior in a public network when it is a clear violation of their ToS," exclaimed Waldman.

She's right. Note, I'm not including the extreme language used against Ariel in this post. Her case is strong enough without it. If you would like to read about the jaw-dropping insults and attacks, read her posts here and here.

Twitter initially showed support for Ariel. In June of 2007, she received the following response from Twitter to her reports of abuse:

“[We] have decided, as a preemptive measure, to remove [the user’s] updates from the public timeline. … If you have anymore problems with [this user], please let us know right away, we’re here to help :)”

Unfortunately, the harassment continued throughout 2007 and as such, Waldman would periodically report each case. After escalating to a dangerous level in 2008, Waldman needed resolution. The abuse was now appearing in traditional search engines, completely affecting her personal brand and potentially, her livelihood.

Ariel was deeply concerned. Flickr was responsive. Twitter's next steps ultimately would become the focus of debate, scrutiny, and the landmark case for ToS and customer service across the Social Web.

At the apex of abuse, Ariel contacted Twitter once again, “Since this is an ongoing case and due to the nature of the content, I think this person is clearly violating Twitter’s TOS and I find it necessary for Twitter to uphold to this: “4. You must not abuse, harass, threaten, impersonate or intimidate other Twitter users.” Honestly, I believe this harassment has gotten way out of hand for too long. I am writing to you and to Twitter to remove this user for consistent long-term harassment.”

Twitter suddenly changed its tune (after three days), “Unfortunately, although [this user’s] behavior is admittedly mean, [s/he] isn’t necessarily doing anything against our terms of service. I’ve been following [their] profile since your first complaint to monitor [them], as well. We can’t remove [this user’s] profile or ban [this user’s] IP address; [they’re] not doing anything illegal.”

Ariel was mortified and as she had told me earlier, she was less concerned about the legality of the issue and completely focused on the abuser's violation of the terms of service - You must not abuse, harass, threaten, impersonate or intimidate other Twitter users.

This time, she cc'd Jack, Twitter's CEO, on her response, "I don’t believe this is a case of illegal activity - this is a clear case of harassment which is outlined in your TOS. To be blunt, I find that someone using your service to call me a “cunt” in a public forum is defined as harassment. Again, your TOS states: You must not abuse, harass, threaten, impersonate or intimidate other Twitter users. It’s Twitter’s responsibility to uphold the TOS, otherwise the TOS has no meaning.”

Jack requested a call on March 19th. Ariel took notes. Here are the highlights:

"I told Jack that it the harassment has escalated and that it was a very clear violation of their TOS and that I had had similar cases of harassment on Flickr in which Flickr took down all 3 of the harassing accounts..."

"...Jack explained that they’re scared to ban someone because they’re scared if it turned into a lawsuit that they are too small of a company to handle it..."

"...Jack additionally explained that their TOS was up for interpretation, to which I responded that it isn’t. I explained that it clearly states “You must not harass other Twitter users” and that harassment is defined as continuous small attacks, which this is..."

"...Jack then asked me about what other social networks had done. I said that Flickr deleted all the profiles and that services like Digg and Pownce don’t think twice about banning abusive or harassing users because it’s part of the TOS..."

"...Jack asked me what good it would do to ban my stalker since it seemed obvious that the stalker would continue to stalk me elsewhere. I told him that it was not his nor Twitter’s responsibility nor business to stop my stalker, but that it was very much their responsibility to identify users violating their TOS on their own service and take action accordingly..."

"...At the end of the conversation, Jack asked me “well, what would be a happy resolution for you?”. I responded saying that seeing the user who is consistently harassing me banned..."

It took three weeks and eight new instances of abuse (that had escalated to include full name and email address) in order to get Twitter to respond again to Ariel. It was this email that sparked Ariel's public response.

Jack replied, "Apologies for the delay here. We’ve reviewed the matter and decided it’s not in our best interest to get involved. We’ve tasked our lawyers with a full review and update of our TOS. Thank you for your patience and understanding and good luck with resolving the problem."

This response is simply unbelievable on many levels, 1) They're more fearful of receiving a lawsuit from those harassing other Twitter users over those getting harassed; 2) Instead of warning the harasser, or even better, removing the offending posts and the account, they opted instead to review the ToS; 3) The very service that is inspiring companies to improve customer service by listening to the conversations on Twitter is instead, not learning how to use it to their own advantage.

Are the terms of service for any company open for review anytime someone asks them to be enforced?

I don't think so...

It doesn't stop here however.

Ariel insisted on keeping this at the customer service level instead of leaning on the emotional pleas for companies to help her stop her stalker. She took the discussion to GetSatisfaction, a new and popular social community for connecting companies, users, and stakeholders around topics that affect customer service.

Ariel opens the forum discussion with a powerful statement, "I think it's extremely important for Twitter to develop policies around their Terms of Service to stick by. In short, it's completely unacceptable for Twitter's users to be harassed to this level and have Twitter refuse to ban anyone for fear of being sued. Yahoo, Flickr, Pownce, and Digg do *not* take these kinds of TOS violations lightly and will ban users/content if there is even a question of harassment.
In fact, I would like to call out that Twitter can't be sued for banning users under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act."

This time, Jason Goldman and company co-founder, Biz Stone addressed Ariel's concerns publicly.

According to Jason, "The existing terms are, as noted, inspired by those used by other services. And through them we reserve the right to take action against many different types of content issues... But in practice, we only act in specific circumstances. (Some of this has been posted before). For this reason, we're in the process of reworking the existing terms to reflect what we enforce."

This stance was supported on the Twitter blog, "This speaks to our larger stance that Twitter is a communication utility, not a mediator of content. For those who are interested in this debate, please note that we are engaged in editing our ToS so it more clearly states the scenarios in which we will take action."

Perhaps the most troubling part for me, other than the fact that Twitter believes that amending the ToS to better cover their asses was the belief that, "Twitter is a recipient-driven utility; you choose what content appears in your timeline. We offer tools like block so that users can distance themselves from others with whom they have disputes or disagreements."

I think for most of us, we view Twitter as a full-fledged community for social networking and not merely a series of pipes for communicating with each other. Blocking people who post derogatory, embarrasing, and damaging remarks and information is not the solution. Just because you no longer see it in your public timeline, doesn't mean that this disparaging content isn't indexable and discoverable on the Web. There's a huge liability issue associated with allowing that content to remain online.

Biz responded with additional information that helped shed light on their decision making process, "This account is no longer available for review because the person who created it willingly removed it back in March. We reviewed this account at the time of the complaint and did not find it in violation of our Terms."

Yes, the person did remove the account, only to continue the harassment through others, includng @confessions, on Twitter.

Biz continued, "The fact that so many of us can have differing opinions without having even reviewed the content we're discussing highlights the difficulty of this issue. In fact, Twitter recognizes that it is not skilled at judging content disputes between individuals. Determining the line between update and insult is not something that Twitter nor a crowd would do well. Essentially, Twitter is a communication utility, not a mediator of content."

Indeed, many challenges are highly subjective and not as clear cut as Ariel's case. Where does it stop? Who's to say what crosses the line? How would these decisions affect the satisfaction of other users?

Well, to be honest, a dedicated community services manager could only help determine those answers. Yes, Twitter is a small company, but it's a big service with massive implications on how people communicate with each other. It's changing everything. They need to set the standard.

And as I said earlier, companies are actively using tools such as Summize, Tweetscan, and GetSatisfaction to listen to conversations taking place on Twitter in order to engage with customers directly.

I disagree with Twitter in that its users definitely view the company as a community and not a communications utility. My phone is a communications utility. IM is a communications utility. Email is a communications utility. Twitter is a social network that connects me to my contacts and in turn connects them back to me in a way where we can learn and share in the greater context of public conversations.

And, of all of the social networks out there, Twitter is by far the most personal, and therefore, the most critical for defining and maintaining terms of service that protect everyone who contribute to making it a valuable and rewarding experience. Anything less relegates the service to the lows of Google and Yahoo boards and unmoderated forums across the Web - services that almost every Twitter user has abandoned because of poor experiences. Twitter is better, and more important, than that.

I asked Ariel that if she could wish for one thing to come out of all of this, what would it be. She responded without hesitation, "I wish that Twitter got the fact that people view them as a community and that they would show a little more understanding of that aspect."

She added, "A little more understanding would only help. I can only hope that people see this as a more serious issue."

Overall, this discussion reminds us of many things. First, and most importantly, beware the things you share in social media. Second, read the terms of services carefully. They should define how you participate within each community. Third, don't be afraid to share your story. While this isn't mob rule, the empathy of your peers can be a strong catalyst for positive change.

As a note to companies, including Twitter, the terms of services must be more than words - especially if they're inspired by other companies who are setting the bar. They serve as the foundation that defines the experience for the very people we hope to retain as users and hopefully, inspire as evangelists as well..

Social Media and Micromedia represent incredibly new opportunities to engage customers with indifferent, negative, and positive views, to help shape perception. People have a powerful voice nowadays and it changes how we listen and respond to them. Recognizing not only the platforms available to customers as well as companies, influences how we should respond, before we respond. These discussions can spread and it's only in our best interest to think through responses that affect the end game, not simply limited to inquiry by inquiry.

The road is long and customers are the fuel that drive us.

For more on this discussion, please read:

Carolyn McCarthy
Violet Blue

Crises Communications 2.0:

Facebook is a Beacon for Bad PR
Apple and the iPhone Price Bomb
The Skype is Falling
Microsoft PR Sparks a Blogstorm of Support and Outrage

Connect with me on Twitter, Jaiku, LinkedIn, Pownce, Plaxo, FriendFeed, Tumblr, or Facebook.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

The Escalator Pitch, Going Up?

The escalator is the new elevator when it comes to pitching and the emerging practice of micro public relations.

While some bloggers and reporters are actively blacklisting PR people, whether it's fair or not, it's not truly fixing or changing anything at a grand scale - at least not yet. I'm part of a growing number of PR folks who are committed to sharing stories, experiences, tools, practices, and ideas on how to specifically fix the relationships between PR and influencers.

But, it's not only PR people who are guilty of unfocused and irrelevant storytelling (spam), it's also company executives and founders who lose a bit of perspective during the reality and grind of product development. In a sense, it puts the blinders on making it incredibly difficult for entrepreneurs to transcend their passion into something more substantial to those outside of their day-to-day ecosystem. This doesn't only correlate to bad or even worse, zero publicity, it affects everything from financing to business development to valuation.

So, I'm here throwing my hat into the ring to also help company executives, as well as PR representatives, condense their pitch into something more palatable, important, promising, and also intriguing. This is an exercise in how you can help those that matter to your business quickly get to the point where they want to know more about your company.

We've all heard of the elevator pitch.

As our attention span thins and tests the true extent of our elasticity, many are finding that most businesses still can't tell their story quickly and concisely without superlatives, buzzwords, technical jargon, and deafening marketing speak. The answer to "what do you do?" doesn't yield much, usually requiring the person listening to ask further qualifying questions in order to get a truly meaningful and relevant answer.

I'm sorry to say that most people don't have the time, patience, or attention to continually ask for more information - nor should they. The onus is on you to tell your story in a way that helps them get it, almost instantly. And, you want them to do something about what they're hearing, not just nod their head in agreement.

That's right. Forget the elevator pitch, it's time to hop on an escalator to a more effective company pitch.

Introducing the escalator pitch.

My good friend Stowe Boyd, recently introduced the concept of the #TwitPitch, a very streamlined way for using Twitter to simplify the process of booking briefings with companies during the show. It forced companies to distill their message in 140 characters, which, in the process, will hopefully tighten and streamline the typical elevator pitch. As Stowe says, “I think twitpitch takes the elevator pitch to new brevity: the escalator pitch.”

The idea of the escalator pitch is game changing and powered by the brevity that takes place on Twitter every minute of every day. It inspires us to embrace brevity and relevance outside of twitter, in the real world, to help people "get" what we do and why they should care.

I've been on the receiving end of elevator pitches for years, and I can honestly tell you that most are much longer than most elevator rides and most certainly, very difficult to discern the value within each - regardless of whether or not the product or service is indeed promising or revolutionary. Simply said, don't assume that anyone is going to see things the way you do.

Several factors usually contribute to ineffective pitches:

1- Lack of presence or conviction

2- Absence of enthusiasm or the over reliance on enthusiasm

3 - Inability to connect with audience

4 - Not knowing who the audiences really are

5 - Dilution of the story with buzzwords and jargon

6 - The story is missing the human factor

7 - No insight for how this changes the world

8 - The path for the future is usually shortsighted

9 - The connection to "what's in it for me" or "how does this improve my flow" are usually missing

10 - A call-to-action is usually overlooked

11 - The misperception that no competition exists

With the introduction of the escalator pitch, spokespersons now face a greater challenge, and with it, a new opportunity, to make a first and lasting impression.

BusinessWeek recently published an article on the philosophy and potential of the escalator pitch and micropitching as a new art form. It featured insight from Stowe and also a quote from yours truly.

The article states that Stowe's "experiment offers a lesson for small companies that want the attention of potential investors, clients, and press: Get to the point."

In the article, I was asked to answer what makes a good escalator pitch? I answered, "Brevity and relevance. It's about focus and precision, and it needs to be aligned and presented in a way that reflects who you write to and why it's beneficial to your readers."

BusinessWeek further summarized my series of responses, "That means tailoring your message to your audience. Tell investors how you're going to make money, tell customers how you're going to solve their problems, and tell bloggers why their readers should care."

According to a Sequoia Capital investor, when Sergey Brin and Larry Page (the Google founders for those who don't know) first approached the firm, their passion, brevity, and clear vision was contagious and inspiring. It's now known as the eight-word pitch that opened the door to further conversations. The founding duo stated that Google would provide "access to the world's information in one click."

It's about saying and demonstrating the things that will continually escalate your opportunity to the next level to say and demonstrate more - earning believers, evangelists, investors, stakeholders, customers, and partners along the way.

In the spirit of TwitPitch and the escalator pitch, Stowe and I last week announced MicroPR, a new service to help connect PR and media/bloggers on Twitter through the practice of pitching from concentrate - again emphasizing succinctness. MicroPR leverages micromedia, starting with Twitter, to connect journalists, bloggers, analysts and PR/marketing together in an efficient, unobtrusive, targeted, and productive way.

I highly recommend that reporters, journalists, bloggers, analysts, and anyone looking for support in story development use it to connect with communications professionals. Likewise, PR people should follow @micropr in order to see these requests as they appear in the Twitter stream.

In its Alpha form, MicroPR will help channel information, starting as a service for media to source stories, share their preferences for receiving information, announce change of beats, call for speakers or awards submissions, or anything that needs to hit a very focused list of savvy and connected PR professionals. Media, bloggers, and PR people, THIS IS A MUST READ.

Get on the Escalator

Honestly, condensing and elevating your pitch and matching it to the specific audience can only help recruit supporters. It’s storytelling, except the story is written 100 different ways - all equally compelling. And, it’s cognizant and representative of to whom you’re speaking. Investors want to know how what you’re doing is going to add value to a market and how and why they're going to embrace it - as well as evaluating the prospect for financial gain. Customers need to hear how what you do solves problems or pains that they may have – or may soon experience. Those customers also have different needs determined by their marketplace. The same is true for the reporters and bloggers who are regarded as resources by each customer demographic - they need to hear things specific to their workflow and community.

The same exercises and practices of micro messaging are critical for helping company spokespersons distill their story for every step of the business process, from funding to sales to exit, in order to seed interest and support and grow the business opportunity as well as the bottom line and overall valuation.

Take it seriously, you are not above improvement.

Assume you have one shot at getting someone excited about what you're doing, because, technically, you do.

Make sure to clearly express who this is different than anything else out there and how it benefits the people who'll use it.

Get friendly feedback.

Rehearse your pitch, continually.

Tighten it.

Evolve it based on reactions.

Share your story in 60 seconds or less, each and every time.

Shape it to include the key points specific to the group to whom you're speaking.

If you can nail it on an escalator, the elevator pitch will seem like a luxury.

Going up?

Connect with me on Twitter, Jaiku, LinkedIn, Pownce, Plaxo, FriendFeed, Tumblr, or Facebook.

Monday, May 19, 2008

Summize Listens to Conversations and Sentiment on Twitter

Just a bit ago, I wrote a post covering my favorite tools for monitoring conversations on Twitter.

I’d like to add one more to the bunch. Recently launched Summize is similar to TweetScan, but also unique in its capabilities and in turn, changes how we may view Twitter search. At the very minimum, it’s a basic search tool that operates similar to how you would naturally search in Yahoo or Google. Both tools bring Twitter alive and expose the layers of conversations taking place that matter to your personal life, your professional brand or the companies/products you may represent.

Developed by Summize Labs, Summize’s mission is to search and discover the topics and attitudes expressed within online conversations.

Summize, provides clean, simple search interface that can be expanded to include more advanced options, similar to Google’s home page, while TweetScan is more of the Yahoo of Twitter search.


For those who are looking for specific content along with emotion, context, location, traffic, or embedded links etc., Summize provides a series of “search operators” to effectively and quickly navigate through the ever-evolving world of micro conversations.

Each search query offers an RSS feed to automatically search and monitor the results as well as the ability to send your results as a Tweet.

The only downside to Summize is that I haven’t noticed an auto-refresh option. It does alert you as new results are found, but you need to manually force it to display them.

Summize Labs is also currently experimenting with a Realtime Twitter Sentiment search tool that locates up-to-the-second tweets about your topic and automatically analyzes and displays the attitudes expressed in those tweets.


All-in-all, I find that I’m using Summize to monitor the conversations that pertain to the companies I represent in order to determine not only context and sentiment, but also the conversations that require our participation.

Companies such as JetBlue, Zappos, H&R Block, Southwest and Dell are already actively listening and participating in conversations on Twitter and throughout the socialmediasphere. They represent a new era of outbound customer service-focused companies seeking to engage the very people who could in turn further evangelize their experiences. Tools such as Summize only help them, and you, identify the conversations that could benefit from personable, informative, and helpful outreach from you or someone within your organization. Otherwise, you leave it up to those who may or may not be qualified to represent your brand to potential stakeholders. And, even worse, you leave the door open to your competition to interject and earn a position of influence.

Here are the conversations taking place on Twitter related to Summize and the related sentiment (note: type summize and then search for sentiment).

Other relevant stories on PR 2.0:
-
PR 2.0 = The Evolution of PR, Nothing Less, Nothing More
-
The Value of Online Conversations
-
Distributed Conversations and Fragmented Attention
-
The Art of Listening and Engagement
-
The Social Media Manifesto
-
Will the Real Social Media Expert Please Stand Up

Connect with me on Twitter, Jaiku, LinkedIn, Pownce, Plaxo, FriendFeed, or Facebook.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

MicroPR Personalizes Public Relations


New media is forcing the rapid evolution of communications and is reinventing the science of public relations into the art of “personalized” relations. And, with micromedia further refining and improving how we communicate with each other, PR is going to learn the hard way, that the days of blasts and untargeted spam pitching will get us nowhere with today’s influencers.

Stowe Boyd placed a stake in the ground during the Web 2.0 Expo with the introduction of #TwitPitch, a very streamlined way for using Twitter to simplify the process of booking briefings with companies during the show. It forced PR to distill their message in 140 characters, which, in the process, tightened and streamlined the typical elevator pitch. As Stowe says, “I think twitpitch takes the elevator pitch to new brevity: the escalator pitch.”

It worked so well that Stowe has officially decided to only accept PR pitches via #TwitPitch.

In this turbulent climate of blogger and media relations – or lack thereof – with PR people, brevity inspires and dictates forethought and relevance. It’s what PR should be practicing whether it’s 140 characters for 200 words.

PR not only stands for Public Relations, we’re now expanding it to also represent the era of Personalized Relations. This is the practice of matching our stories with the preferences of those we wish to reach. Yes, it's what PR should have been all along, but it's not.

Twitter is proving to be a marvelous representation of people coming together online to share and discover new information in ways that weren’t possible, or predictable, before today. It has effectively created a new channel for casual conversation as well as a full-blown broadcast network for breaking news as it happens. For many of us, we’ve heard “it” first on Twitter.

What if Twitter also became a hub for newsmakers and influencers to seek information before the story was officially news? With the globally diverse and connected community, Twitter harnesses the true wisdom of the crowds to ask and receive specific information instantly.

Introducing MicroPR.

Stowe Boyd and I are collaborating to find and share new and helpful ways of using micromedia, starting with Twitter, to connect journalists, bloggers, analysts and PR/marketing together in an efficient, unobtrusive, targeted, and productive way.

We’re starting with Twitter in large part because Stowe is already proving that the concept works and also, because journalists, bloggers, and analysts are flocking to Twitter – actively using it more than much larger social networks such as Facebook. (see partial working list below). MicroPR will become the epicenter that connects information, sources, and stories on Twitter and eventually across other social networks.

In Stowe's words...

MicroPR: forcing PR firms to approach us in the open, on open social flow apps like Twitter, and in the small, where they have to jettison all the claptrap of the old press release model. In the open, that can't lie easily, or they will be caught on it. In the small, they have to junk the meaningless superlatives, the bogus quotes that no CEO ever mouthed, the run-on phrases, the disembodied third party mumbo jumbo, as if the press release were edited by God.

Using MicroPR

PR people, subscribe to the @MicroPR feed and definitely follow it on Twitter. You can also run active searches or feeds on Summize or TweetScan.

Bloggers, journalists, analysts, send a public message @MicroPR when you want to reach PR professionals. The @tweet will get an auto retweet from the MicroPR account.

In its Alpha form, MicroPR will help channel information, starting as a service for media to source stories, share their preferences for receiving information, announce change of beats, call for speakers or awards submissions, or anything that needs to hit a very focused list of savvy and connected PR professionals.

If you’re asking why you would need to use the service if you already have followers on Twitter, MicroPR will connect you to a broader, more effective network of resources for stories today and in the future.

Examples of usage:

- Reporters looking for help with on story development can send a tweet, “@micropr Need startup recommendations for story on new micromedia tools. Reply via public tweet to @reportername” (112 characters).

- Journalists and bloggers can declare that they do or do not want to be pitched via Twitter and other micromedia tools. They can also announce their specific preferences for contact.

- They could declare what sorts of microPR they want (or don't want) to receive, and in what mode -- @public messages or direct/private.

- A writer can share relevant beats @micropr beats = #social #micromedia #networks #media #infrastructure #hosting.

- Conference and awards organizers can call for speakers or submissions.

- Media can also block certain PR people who are doing it wrong.

- Other services could include scheduling calls and or meetings, etc.

The options, capabilities, and feature-set will expand over time (with input from the community), but in the meantime, MicroPR is an effective channel to connect people to relevant information in order to be more productive. And, it also serves as one of the necessary foundations that will help shape the future of more personalized and effective communications, teach PR professionals how to listen, respond, and pursue more targeted and relevant outreach.

NOTE: PR, please do not send @micropr messages unless you want that note to be broadcast to other PR people. If you want to refer to it on Twitter, please use the hashtag #micropr.

----

Journalists and Bloggers on Twitter Alpha v1.0
Please note that this list is in the process of being updated and corrected and will ultimately reside on a public wiki. In the meantime, please contact me with changes and suggestions, or if you wish your name to be removed from the list. PR, be sure to follow your favorites.

Warning: Only contact reporters and bloggers using their preferred methods and channels. Do not send spam. Doing so will not only get you blacklisted, but will also get you blocked on Twitter.

Stowe says it best, "On Twitter, I will simply block people that abuse my willingness to have an open dialog about products with PR folks, or basically anyone else, for that matter."

Reporter
Publication
Followers
Twitter ID
Adam Boulton
Sky News UK
93
@skynewsboulton

Allen Stern

CenterNetworks

2408

@centernetworks

Amanda Congdon

AmandaCongdon.com

1398

@amazingamanda

Ana Marie Cox

Time.com

1733

@anamariecox

Arthur Germain

Brand Telling

35

@ahg3

Bicyclemark

Citizen Reporter

396

@bicyclemark

Brent Terrazas

Brentter.com

152

@brentter

Brian Morrissey

Adweek

911

@brianmorrissey

C Kirkham

Times-Picayune

40

@ckirkham

Caroline McCarthy

News.com

1329

@caroliiine

D Sarno

L.A. Times

103

@dsarno

Dan Farber

CNET

704

@dfarber

Dan Thomas

WSJ

48

@danthomas100

Daniel Terdiman

Cnet

452

@greeterdan

Darren Waters

BBC News

539

@djwaters1

Dave Slusher

Evil Genius Chronicles

409

@geniodiabolico

Dave Winer

Media Hacker

8760

@davewiner

David Griner

Luckie.com

151

@griner

David Lidsky

Fast Company

34

@ASTfan2006

David Wescott

Its Not A Lecture Blog

435

@dwescott1

Dawn Foster

Fast Wonder

497

@geekygirldawn

Doc Searls

Searls.com

1938

@dsearls

Duncan Riley



2164

@duncanriley

Dwight Silverman

Houston Chronicle

839

@dsilverman

Elisabeth Lewin

PodcastingNews

565

@podcastmama

Etan Horowitz

Orlando Sentinel

209

@etanowitz

Gabe Rivera

Techmeme

1478

@gaberivera

Ginny Skal

NBC 17 Raleigh

413

@ginnyskal

Graeme Thickins

Tech~Surf~Blog

140

@graemethickins

Harry McCracken



239

@harrymccracken

Heather Green

BusinessWeek

282

@heatherlgreen

Henry Blodget

Silicon Alley Insider

169

@hblodget

Houston Chronicle

Houston Chronicle

57

@houstonchron

Hugh MacLeod

Gaping Void

5704

@gapingvoid


Jason Calacanis

Mahalo

22998

@jasoncalacanis

Jemima Kiss

JemimaKiss.com + The Gaurdian

1301

@jemimakiss

Jim Long

NBC

5362

@newmediajim

Jim Louderback

Revision3

1129

@jlouderb

Jimmy Wales

Wikipedia

2017

@jwales

John Dickerson

Slate

1060

@jdickerson

John Dvorak

Dvorak Blog

12720

@therealdvorak

Justin Beck

SF Chronicle

6

@sfc_justinbeck

Kara Andrade

Maynard Institute

120

@newmaya

Kara Swisher

AllThingsD.com

611

@karaswisher

Katie Fehrenbacher

Earth 2 Tech

71

@katiefehren

Kevin Allison

Financial Times

92

@kevinallisonft

Kevin Rose

Digg

23335

@kevinrose

Kristen Nicole

Mashable

761

@kristennicole2

Laura Lorek

My San Antonio Blog

117

@lalorek

Lee Sherman

Avenue A -Razorfish

174

@lsherman

Leo Laporte

Leoville.com

26717

@leolaporte

Lisa Picarille

Revenue Magazine

408

@lisap

Liz Gannes

GigaOm

511

@ganneseses

Loren Steffy

HoustonChronicle

111

@lsteffy

Louis Gray

LouisGray.com

814

@louisgray

Marc Canter

Marc’s Voice

668

@marccanter4real

Mark Glaser

PBS

267

@mediatwit

Mark Hopkins

Mashable

954

@rizzn

Mark Krynsky

Lifestream Blog

326

@krynsky

Marshall Kirkpatrick

Read Write Web

2670

@marshallk

Mathew Ingram

MathewIngramBlog

1035

@mathewi

MG Siegler

Paris Lemon + VentureBeat

1062

@parislemon

Michael Banovsky

Banovsky Blog

105

@michaelbanovsky

Mike Arrington

TechCrunch

13777

@techcrunch

Mike Butcher

TechCrunch UK

1627

@mbites

Molly Wood

CNET

5483

@mollywood

Natali del Conte

CNET

130

@cnetloaded

Nick Gonzalez

TechCrunch Contributor

228

@nickgonzalez

Om Malik

GigaOM

2401

@om

Owen Thomas

Valleywag

113

@owenthomas

Pete Cashmore

Mashable

6611

@mashable

Peter Rojas

Engadget

740

@peterrojas

Rafe Needleman

Webware

3427

@rafe

Richard MacManus

ReadWriteWeb

1602

@rww

Robert Scoble

Fast Company

22034

@scobleizer

Robert W. Anderson

Expert Texture

114

@rwandering

Ryan Block

RyanBlock.com

2493

@ryanblock

Sam Whitmore

Media Survey

250

@samwhitmore

Sarah Lacy

BusinessWeek

2516

@sarahcuda

Sarah Perez

Read Write Web

837

@sarahintampa

Saul Hansell

NY Times

133

@shansell

Steve Baker

BusinessWeek

363

@stevebaker

Steve Gillmor

eWeek

2004

@stevegillmor

Steve Spaulding

How to Split an Atom

857

@sbspalding

Stewart Alsop

StewartAlsop.com

362

@salsop

Stowe Boyd

/Message

2866

@stoweboyd

The Guy Report

ESPN, Playboy

21

@theguyreport

Tod Maffin

CBC

695

@todmaffin

Tom Merritt

CNET

4241

@acedtect

Veronica Belmont

Revision3

14147

@veronica


Wayne Sutton

NBC 17 Raleigh

3387

@waynesutton

---

I’d also like to specifically thank Chris Peri (on Twitter) for helping us with the process of retweeting and also Todd Defren, Sam Whitmore, Chris Lynn, Brad Mays, and many, many others for contributing to the directory of media actively using Twitter today.

Additional Resources on PR 2.0:

- In Blogger and Media Relations, You Earn the Relationships You Deserve
- The Evolution of Press Releases
- Making Mistakes and Amends in Blogger and Media Relations
- PR 2.0: Putting the Public Back in Public Relations
- Free ebook:
The Art and Science of Blogger Relations
- Dear Chris Anderson, an Open Letter to Make Things Right

Connect with me on Twitter, Jaiku, LinkedIn, Pownce, Plaxo, FriendFeed, or Facebook.