PR 2.0: December 2007

Thursday, December 27, 2007

PR Advice for Startups





In celebration of
Alex Iskold’s brilliant toolbox for startups on Read/Write Web today, I’ve decided to join the conversation to help startups make PR work for them now and in the long term.

PR is one of the most misunderstood disciplines in the marketing department and many startup entrepreneurs and even veteran executives are quick to under estimate and under value it, or on the contrary, expect PR to solve all of their marketing needs all with just one email or press release.

In order to be successful in Public Relations, you need to grasp what it is, what it isn’t, and how it works and why. Otherwise, you’ll never be able to build the right team, determine the best strategies to amplify visibility and gain traction, or have the ability to effectively measure it.

And, for disclosure purposes, the following points are based on good PR and are highly summarized and simplified to get you thinking. As in anything, there’s more to the story. And, there are always those that do not represent PR in the best possible light. Keep in mind that those who do not practice PR effective are obvious when you know what to look for, and thankfully, they do not represent the entire industry.


While much of this seems like common sense, please remember how uncommon common sense really is.

1. Understand what PR is and isn't.

All too often, businesses expect PR to perform miracles simply because they confuse it with advertising, online marketing, media buying, search marketing, etc. PR can't guarantee legitimate coverage in industry publications - no matter how tight the relationship. If PR promises it, then they're lying. I leverage relationships daily to consider stories that I package in a way that's most relevant to them. Most of the time it works because I take the time to make it valuable to respective markets. If I took advantage of my contacts to force coverage whenever I needed to deliver on a promise, then it would mark the beginning of the end of my relationships.

While I won't compare PR to each branch of marketing, I will say that PR IS NOT ADVERTISING. Reporters and bloggers don't stop what they're doing to write about your company, just because we send them a press release. They're bombarded by PR people all over the world. Stories are cultivated. If we respect them, do our homework, and help highlight the value of a story, coverage is imminent.

If you want guaranteed exposure, buy an ad.


2. Don't under value PR.

PR, when done right, is extremely valuable to company branding, which has immeasurable benefits in the long haul. Customers have choices and if you're not consistently vying for their attention, it's pretty easy to fall off their radar screen when they evaluate options. Too many companies nickle and dime PR to the point of absurdity. Don't get me wrong. Expensive PR doesn't equal success. But short changing PR is usually a first step in the wrong direction.


3. PR is not a switch.

It doesn't go off and on whenever you have the time or budget to throw at it. The market moves too quickly, and if you're not actively participating in it, you'll quickly find that company sales and site traffic will begin a downward spiral that may or may not recover. Embrace it. Nurture it. Stick with it. PR is an inexpensive solution for gaining visibility within the market segments that matter to your business.

Don’t fool yourself. As a company executive, you can not and should not run PR yourself. You have more important things to do, like say, run a company.

If you turn off the PR switch, your competitors will steal your thunder, and, your customers.


4. Initial and consistent coverage takes time.

In most cases, coverage doesn't just happen. PR is like farming. The more seeds you plant, along with the time you spend watering, caring for, and feeding them, your crops will grow in the form of coverage over time. While some things such as news, etc., force information out quickly, other stories take time. And when they appear, they help raise brand visibility, drive some people to buy, and they also spark others to consider writing about it - which in turn also influences the cycle to replicate. Don't assume all of this coverage happens simply because you are a popular company.

Also, realize that there are different forms of media and they each react to different stories in their own way. Trades (whether traditional media or blogs) will cover certain things that relate to your industry whereas mainstream media will need the story presented in a way that has broader appeal.


5. Get a spokesperson.

Just because you created the product doesn't mean you're the best person to sell it. I've worked with some of the most passionate executives that just don't click with the people they're trying to engage - no matter how hard they try. This has negative impact that lasts and is tough to overcome.

Suck it up and get a spokesperson who can help tell the story to the people that will help grow your business.


6. PR is not the only tool in the shed.

Understand that PR is only an umbrella for the specific communications initiatives that will help you achieve complementary, simultaneous goals. For example, corporate branding and product marketing require different campaigns. Don’t put all of your eggs in the PR basket. Run SEO campaigns. Look at online ads and promotions. Run contests. Attend events.

PR can not be the only thing you rely on in order to build and sustain a successful business.


7. PR at the Head, Across Chasms, and in the Long Tail

No matter what industry you're in, realize that the most popular blogs, newspapers, or magazines are only one part of the process.


Your market is divided by adoption and buying behavior and documented through a bell curve rich with chasms, pyramids that further divide and classify them, quadrants that demonstrate competitive advantages, ladders that represent the technology that people can use to reach customers in different ways, a cluetrain that shows how people carry it through the long tail, and hopefully reflected by a hockey stick that forces you to evaluate what to do from Inside the Tornado.

Yes, of course this was meant to be funny...but it does show that one program no longer serves the masses when you deconstruct it by the markets and the people that comprise it.This means that you have to embrace both new media and traditional media in PR.

For example, in the tech space, TechCrunch, Mashable, VentureBeat, Read/Write Web, et al, will yield measurable traffic so great that most of the time it will knock out Web servers.

Every executive wants them. CEOs cry if they can't get coverage on them. But, by no means, do they carry your value proposition to the entire collective of people that will embrace your product and help sustain your business for the whole game.

They represent the early adopters and pragmatists. However, there are other worlds of global microcommunities rich with horizontal and vertical publications and blogs that will carry your story to the more conservative groups of people that collectively converge as the primary base of recurring revenue.In this case, it's less about traffic and hits as metrics for success and more about quality, registrations, purchases, referrals, etc. that define business growth and sustenance.

8. Engage in social media.

We live in a "social" economy and the only way to succeed in it, is to participate. Participation is marketing.
Community relations is marketing. Engagement builds trust, relationships and loyalty, but it requires a genuine, dedicated, proactive, and value-driven effort.

Blog about industry-relevant topics, not just company accomplishments. Provide tips and hints to help your customers make more informed decisions. It's not a new tool in the marketing belt. It is a new opportunity to engage customers and cultivate relationships. Simply put, be a resource for your community.

Embrace online
video and watch how creative, genuine, and cool content becomes incredibly viral. Words can carry the message so far, but video is also an opportunity to showcase the product while entertaining viewers.

Podcast new updates, customer successes, ideas for new product uses, etc.
Bookmark and share relevant links using the popular social tools available.

Cultivate user generated content.

The press release IS NOT DEAD. Write them. Write
social media releases. Write SEO press releases. However, write them well and strip out all of the bull shit, hyperbole, and marketing speak. Make them meaningful.

If relevant, build transparent profiles in the social networks where you can find and support customers.

Share images and behind the scenes footage using services such as flickr and YouTube.

Listen and engage in
MicroMedia.

Hire a community manager. In the new world of social media, new PR can be complemented through the efforts of someone who can actively represent the company in all things social so that they can provide proactive information and support to people looking for guidance in the communities they frequent. Don't market to them, have conversations.

Note, this is an ultra-simplified list of how to jump into the world of social media. Read the
Social Media Manifesto and The Art and Science of Community Relations for additional suggestions and guidance.

9. Support and reward your PR program.

Feed it as you do any other branch of the company. Respect it when it works and let your team share in the success. Don't focus on the shortcomings. Don’t take credit for coverage if you randomly sent someone an email a long time ago. Don’t tell your PR team that the coverage that’s happening is solely driven by the viral activities of users and other existing coverage. PR is designed to spark Word of Mouth and every time a new article appears, it’s because of something that PR did either recently or awhile ago. That’s the value of PR. It’s the program that keeps on giving!

Bottom line, extend congratulations as goals are achieved and support PR in a way that keeps your team motivated to kick ass.

10. Keep good people.

If you find a PR person or team that truly lives and breathes the company and the product, never let them go. They are a rare breed and deserve support and promotion.

11. Keep an open line of communication.

Meet with your PR team regularly to communicate realistic goals and measure progress. Paint a real world picture of what success looks like each month and listen to the reports to see if they are indeed attainable. You get out of PR what you put into it.


12. Establish realistic metrics.

PR isn’t a miracle solution to help you attain all business objectives.

Agree upon realistic metrics in advance.


All too often executives lose sight of what PR is designed to do. The right coverage is invaluable, even when it doesn't translate into visible hits, traffic spikes, or sales. Super Bowl ads, for example, rarely pay for themselves in the short run.Realize that a proactive, intelligent and consistent PR program will contribute to the bottom line. It shouldn't be solely responsible for company success or failure.

Metrics can be in the form of specific targets every month, traffic, registrations, lead generation, links, and now, conversations.

13. Do not launch your company or product at a conference.

Contrary to popular belief, do not attempt to launch your company at a tradeshow unless it is a venue specifically designed to make your launch successful. For example, in Tech, we have
DEMO and TechCrunch40, and each draw worldwide attention. But, the best PR is always done before the event.

At conferences, companies kick and scream for attention and usually drown each other out. Tell your story before you have to compete to do so. However, go to conferences and events for lead generation and networking.

14. Do not start contacting people on your own.

This is one of my personal favorites. Many executives believe that in order to get something done right, they have to do it on their own. So, they start emailing reporters and bloggers on a whim without regard for relationship, existing conversations, or their best interests. I have seen some pretty interesting ramifications for doing so.

All I can say is this. Consult with PR before doing so. In fact, sometimes contact is best coming directly from an executive. It just needs to be planned and orchestrated in a way that is beneficial to reporter/blogger, the company, and the overall PR initiative.

15. Breaking News

The blogosphere and social media in general has created the need for
new rules when breaking news.

Determine who your news benefits, where they go for information, and what they’re looking for. Then reverse engineer the process and design everything around what you learned, from writing the release, what you say and how you say it, to whom and when.

Do not rely on a wire service to get your news out. PR is best served by specifically working with the new and traditional influencers who can help get your story told, in advance, and usually under
embargo. (Note: Most of the time, less is more. Do not try to take your news to anybody and everybody under embargo. Be smart about it. A few key places can carry your story farther, and, without ruining relationships with influencers along the way.)

Exclusives are a rare practice these days and usually reserved for some pretty incredible and industry moving news.

16. Customer service

Customer service is no longer an inbound activity or viewed as a cost center. Social Media changed everything and it isn't a spectator sport.

Marketing-savvy corporate executives are working with PR, Advertising, and Marcom teams to explore options and strategies on how to participate in relevant online conversations. This represents a shift in outbound marketing as it creates a direct channel between companies and customers, and ultimately people.

Social Media is rooted in conversations between people and peers, regardless of the technology that facilitates them, and every day they take place across blogs, networks, forums, micromedia, and online groups. And, each day, with every new community and social tool that is introduced, brands, products and services are actively discussed, supported, and disassembled.

Social Media represents an entirely new way to reach customers and connect with them directly. It adds an outbound channel that complements inbound customer service and traditional PR, direct marketing and advertising, placing companies and their customers on a level playing field to discuss things as peers. Most importantly, it transcends the process of simply answering inbound questions to creating a community of enthusiasts and evangelists.

17. PR isn’t charity.

While many PR people and agencies demand unreasonable fortunes, remember that you’re a startup and solutions are abundant when you know what you’re looking for and value the engagement.

In PR, you get what you pay for – well most of the time anyway. Don’t expect brilliant PR for pennies. Nor should you expect results by over paying for services. There are consultants, individuals, and agencies willing to work for reasonable cash and stock incentives. But, I can’t think of anyone, who’s good at what they do, that will work on a performance-based payment program.

PR just doesn’t work that way. Think of it this way. Good sales people don’t work solely on commission. Most earn a salary on top of their commission to keep them active and successful. If PR people wanted to earn their income on a commission basis, they would get into sales where they can usually make a lot more money. They’re in PR because they prefer to “tell” a story instead of “selling” it.

18. You’re not the only company with a great story

Remember this. At any given moment, reporters and bloggers are getting bombarded with pitches, both good and bad, by companies that take the time to learn what they want in addition to those who simply spam them and hope for the best. It’s overwhelming to say the least.

They have better things to do than stop everything that they’re working on just to read your press release. This is one of the reasons why you need PR. Well that, and the fact that you need someone who’s not drinking the bath water to tell you that your story needs help in how it’s told to the specific groups of people to whom it matters.

Just because it’s new doesn’t make it newsworthy.

You have to compete for attention and in order to do so effectively and genuinely, you need someone who can help tell your story, the right way, through the people who reach the customers that will impact your bottom line. It’s not an overnight process. It’s not a game. It’s a process of investing in building and leveraging relationships now and in the long term.


Download as a Word Doc.

Download as a PDF.

Connect with me on Twitter, Jaiku, Pownce, Plaxo, or Facebook

Saturday, December 22, 2007

ebook: The Art and Science of Social Media and Community Relations



After running the popular series that evaluated and discussed ThinkFree's experiment in Social Media, I decided to compile all of the posts into one free and downloadable ebook for your reference.

Download as a Word doc

Download as a PDF




The Series on PR 2.0:

The Art and Science of Social Media and Community Relations

Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part I

Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part II

Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part III

Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part IV

Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part V
----

Connect with me on Twitter, Jaiku, Pownce, Plaxo, or Facebook

Friday, December 21, 2007

Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media – Part V



Jonathan Crow of
ThinkFree recently conducted what he calls “The Great Social Experiment,” where he tested the art of online social networking to evaluate whether or not joining the conversation across popular online communities would benefit his company.Crow created a roundtable featuring Chris Brogan, Aaron Brazell, Cathryn Hrudicka, Doug Haslam, and me to offer feedback, constructive criticism, and advice to help ThinkFree and other companies learn from his experiment.

Before you read below, make sure to first read, “
The Art and Science of Social Media and Community Relations.”

Question 5. How can I build better mechanisms into the framework to increase feedback?

We’ve all heard that participation is marketing. As well, we’ve seen the banner that reads conversations are marketing.

Great.

So, what about relationships?

We speak of building mechanisms into frameworks and while we search for the right answers, we’re overshooting the very thing that Social Media revolves around, people.

Social Media isn’t a catalyst to summon marketing for marketing’s sake. It’s an opportunity to engage with groups of people by tapping into conversations that mutually serve the benefits of the very people we wish to reach.

The key is participation and I define participation as the ante that’s determined by each distinct community. The minimum investment to play is sincerity, authenticity, trustworthiness, and genuine intent.

Answer the following questions.

What do you want to get out of each network and why should people care about your involvement?

Then identify those you want to reach by monitoring the very conversations you wish to join. They're not lining up to hear from you...I'm just saying.



There must be value associated with the dialog as most are seeds for potential relationships.

But, these things take time, focus, and nurturing. This isn’t broadcast marketing. This is one-to-one discussions that can provide incredible value back to you and your company as long as the rules of engagement are clear and not manipulated.Social networks provide the foundation for one-to-one interactions and even one-to-many without losing its openness, as long as the intent is clear and honest.

Basically everything comes down to how you relate to the communities you wish to embrace and in turn, how they embrace you and your involvement. It’s pretty natural to enhance feedback when your stature in each community represents your investment.

It takes time, patience, sincerity, and value. This is about relationships and it’s much bigger and more relevant than just you and the company you represent.

Again, companies will earn the relationships they deserve.

This is about people and the evolution of business marketing, from broadcast to interaction, from marketing to solutions.

Click
here to read the responses from the entire roundtable.
----
The Art and Science of Social Media and Community Relations
Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part I
Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part II
Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part III
Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part IV
----
Connect with me on Twitter, Jaiku, Pownce, Plaxo, or Facebook

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media – Part IV


Source

Jonathan Crow of ThinkFree recently conducted what he calls “The Great Social Experiment,” where he tested the art of online social networking to evaluate whether or not joining the conversation across popular online communities would benefit his company.Crow created a roundtable featuring Chris Brogan, Aaron Brazell, Cathryn Hrudicka, Doug Haslam, and me to offer feedback, constructive criticism, and advice to help ThinkFree and other companies learn from his experiment.

Before you read below, make sure to first read, “The Art and Science of Social Media and Community Relations.”

4a. How much of getting social networking to work is the contacts you bring with you?
4b. How aggressive should one be in reaching out to new contacts?
4c. Should I, for instance, try to befriend Chris Anderson even after I have composed a note meant to appeal to what he is interested in?

The art of relationships is based on the same principles and intentions online as it is in real life. In Social Media these days, we tend to get caught up in the coolest tools and forget that this is all about people.

Getting Social Media “to work” has less to do with what you have and more to do with who you know, who you should know, and how you communicate with them now and in the future – and it’s ongoing.

Before you can reach out to new contacts, it’s absolutely critical that you monitor where the conversations that matter to you and your business are taking place. Observe. Listen. Read.

Embrace the unique dynamics that are inherent to each community.


Once you get a feel for it, participate as a person and not a marketer. This is such an important and pivotal step and is both easy and natural to overlook. Marketers are good marketers. But in the realm of Social Media, the community benefits from people who are good listeners as well as those who are helpful and provide value.


Source

It’s not about how aggressive you engage or whether or not you’re worthy of befriending a-listers. This is about finding opportunities to do so. And, it’s an investment of time in communities, conversations, and relationships; an investment that is radically underestimated by most businesses who wish to reap the benefits of Social Media without the due diligence or effort.

This perspective shares more with the principles of good customer service and relationship building than marketing, popularity contests, or cursory attempts achieving ROI by hollow engagement.

Each community requires dedication and a unique approach to how to find, listen to, and interact with the people that matter to you and to your business. Relationships are based on mutual benefits, so think about what you bring to the table and why before you jump in.

How can you also serve the best interests of the community while they in turn help you? How do you want to be remembered within the social networks you participate? Answer these and then reinforce that impression in everything you do.

Click here to read the responses from the entire roundtable.
----
The Art and Science of Social Media and Community Relations
Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part I
Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part II
Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part III
----
Connect with me on Twitter, Jaiku, Pownce, Plaxo, or Facebook.

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media – Part III


Source

Jonathan Crow of ThinkFree recently conducted what he calls "The Great Social Experiment," where he tested the art of online social networking to evaluate whether or not joining conversations across popular online communities would benefit his company. Crow created a roundtable featuring Chris Brogan, Aaron Brazell, Cathryn Hrudicka, Doug Haslam, and me to offer feedback, constructive criticism, and advice to help ThinkFree and other companies learn from his experiment.

Before you read below, make sure to first read, “
The Art and Science of Social Media and Community Relations.”

3a. Is social networking the right tool for the tests I created?
3b. Are my expectations of social networking in line with what it can do?
3b. What is social networking best geared to address?


Source

In order for businesses to understand the value and focus of a valuable social media campaign, it requires a dedicated strategy, goals, metrics, and a tactical plan.

It all starts with answering two simple questions, “why do we want to participate?” and “what do we hope to get out of it?”

The process of answering these questions will define how and where to participate and how to measure success.

The next step is to listen and answer the following questions.

Where are your competitors?

Where do key words take you?

Are there conversations taking place about your company, products, and if so, where?

You’ll find that there are hubs across Social Media that will require your participation. In ThinkFree’s case, Facebook, LinkedIn, Digg, ThinkFree Docs, and most importantly, the company blog, would be the areas of immediate concentration. Plaxo, Twitter, and others, might require attention and effort at a later time.

ThinkFree’s business would benefit from the promotion of the great content residing in ThinkFree Docs, the capabilities of ThinkFree Office and also the ability to source and promote content from and to the community across other networks.

But it requires time, investment, cultivation, sincerity, and, it is not an overnight process.

Each network represents a collective of various groups of people who orbit an axis of common interests and each group as well as each network maintains its own ecosystem. Basically, what this means is that each community serves a different purpose, not just in who you reach, but how and why. The discussions and the very nature of the conversations are different from network to network.

The point that I can not emphasis enough is that you get out of Social Media what you put into it.

You have to observe before you can participate. Doing so will answer all of your questions and even dictate how to engage.

Click
here to read the responses from the entire roundtable.

----
Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part II

Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part I

The Art and Science of Social Media and Community Relations
----

Connect with me on Twitter, Jaiku, Pownce, Plaxo, or Facebook.

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media – Part II


Source

Jonathan Crow of ThinkFree recently conducted what he calls "The Great Social Experiment," where he tested the art of online social networking to evaluate whether or not joining the conversation across popular online communities would benefit his company.

Crow created a
roundtable featuring Chris Brogan, Aaron Brazell, Cathryn Hrudicka, Doug Haslam, and me to offer feedback, constructive criticism, and advice to help ThinkFree and other companies learn from his experiment.

Before you read below, make sure to first read, “
The Art and Science of Social Media and Community Relations.”

2. How should we be judging the outcomes from social networking activities? Are there tools you recommend?

As I mentioned in my
last post, in order for businesses to understand Social Media, it requires a realistic strategy, goals, metrics, and a tactical plan. It all starts with answering two questions, why do we want to participate and what do we want to get out of it?

This is usually where traditional media and new media split. Traditional marketing is rooted in tangible results such as press coverage, traffic, revenue and those things should still matter in conversational marketing. This can’t be solely driven by experimentation because time is money!

Metrics must be determined before engaging and then actively monitored and analyzed to modify future interactions and targets to stay on track.

However, there is an investment component in all of this that’s somewhat comparable to the model of having a great customer service infrastructure. It’s actually a significant cost center to all businesses that care about having a global community of happy, satisfied, and enthusiastic customers. The difference is that with Social Media, an outbound element is added to the traditional inbound model.

No it’s not a copout for aligning metrics to engagement. It is, though, a different way to look at things. And, it brings the discussion outside of just PR and marketing. Meaningful engagement can also be led by product marketing and customer service.

Last year I discussed the concept of scientifically analyzing the Return on Participation (ROP) or Return on Engagement (ROE), which called for feedback to help determine what it is that matters to businesses in order to justify the expense of running social media campaigns.

The easy answer is as true today as it was then. It’s different for each company.

It’s also different specific to the campaign you’re running.

I think it creates new line items that are separate from traditional marketing and should receive funding and resources from both marketing and customer service budgets.

In general, some of the most effective ways that we’ve measured success to date include community feedback, trackable conversations, traffic through landing pages, referrals, and also registrations specific to campaigns. Really, it’s similar in concept to Web marketing. However, measuring conversations and tracking associated activity is an interesting and creative art.

The tools that we use to track activity and conversations include Technorati, Twitter, blogpulse, Google Blog Search, Compete, Google Analytics, Alexa, specific social network searches, among others.


What’s the value of a conversation?

What’s the value of transforming an unhappy customer into an enthusiast?

Many companies can learn from big businesses who are shifting their reward-based strategies from who can take the most calls in an hour to who can create the most enthusiasts.

Like I’ve said, customer service is the
new, new marketing and there’s a lot to learn from separating (or expanding) engagement from PR to those immersed in the product, its value, benefits, strengths, and weaknesses.

Measurement is a combination of customer service, brand resonance, brand loyalty and bottom line business traction and lead generation.

And like I’ve always said, businesses will earn the respect, and ultimately the business, of the customers they deserve.

Click
here to read the responses from the entire roundtable.
----
Experiments and Lessons Learned in Social Media Part I
The Art and Science of Social Media and Community Relations
----

Connect with me on
Twitter, Jaiku, Pownce, Plaxo, or Facebook.

Friday, December 14, 2007

Don't Throw Out that Social Media Rulebook Quite Yet

...use some of it as a reference guide instead.



I have to hand it to Chip Griffin. His recent post, "Throwing Out the Social Media Rulebook" is thought provoking to say the least.

In his post, Griffin assertively proclaims, "I’m here to tell you that most of the rules are bunk, and we as an industry to ourselves a disservice by frightening off potential participants with absurd proclamations of the way things must be."

I like it.

I agree with the premise.

I found however, that many of the reasons aren't grasping the full story of "why" some of the rules do or do not make sense. I think I know what he was trying to say, but it wasn't coming through in the post. And, since we're migrating through times of debate and confusion among the general marketing community, it's important to tell a balanced story.

If it's to get people thinking, then mission accomplished. Like I said, I absolutely agree with the premise of his discussion.

If it's to tell people to break the rules, hey, go for it. Rules, what rules? We don't need no stinking rules.

I've only offered recommendations and guidelines based on the work that I've done to help steer people away from making asses out of themselves and the companies that they represent.

Rather than speculate however, I asked Griffin via twitter what he wanted us to walk away with after reading his post.

He updated his story with the following statement, “I hope what people take from my comments is that we should encourage even baby steps and small words in the social media space and not get caught up as much as many of us do with being quick to criticize lack of adherence to all of our ideals.”


Amen.

Baby steps are all steps in the right direction.

The only reason I'm writing this post, is to offer an extension to the discussion he started. It's my way of helping people find resolution, answers, and direction somewhere in the middle.

I can tell you that I have said some of the things in the very rulebook that he suggests throwing out. I have also backed up those statements with everything that I have learned in both the successes and failures that I have experienced to date. It's theory debunked or reinforced by practice. Nothing more, nothing less.

But, don't use the principles as a playbook. Use them to create your own guidebook.

If anything, this discussion represents the dire need for people to stop marching in the "Social Media Love" parade and start practicing what we preach.

At the end of the day, I am standing up for, and contributing to, the evolution of marketing and public relations in a way that's meaningful and sincere across traditional and social media practices.

Without further adu, let's address Griffin's points, one by one:

1. It Isn’t a Blog Without RSS.

It has less to do with whether or not RSS is mainstream, as it's already is starting to impact not just how people read information, but also how they sync data across multiple platforms - even if they don't know what's going on behind the scenes.

Giving people options to subscribe to an RSS feed is no more technologically advanced than entering an email address to subscribe to a newsletter. Companies like bloglines and netvibes are helping people jump into the world of feed readers. But people are also getting introduced to general readers through new incarnations of popular Web browsers as well.


It already represents where everything is moving. Therefore it's important, and really simple (syndicate - that's a geek joke) to integrate it into a blog and anything else a company produces. RSS helps your appeal to a greater variety of people, but also feel free to offer other ways to access your information.

It's not just for geeks.

At the same time, there's nothing wrong with bookmarking sites and reading them outside of a reader. The point is to cater to a wider variety of people who prefer to have things their way.

2. It Isn’t a Blog Without Comments.

Comments are part of the conversation. Closing them is one thing. But measuring the success of a blog based on the amount of comments is just lame.

Reading blogs via RSS versus reading posts through a browser is a different experience for now. Soon, however, the RSS feed will include everything.

I can tell you quite honestly, as is evident by many great posts, that sometimes the comments are better than the post itself. I have my most meaningful conversations not in Twitter, or blog posts, but in the comments section of posts across the blogosphere. The post on MediaBullseye proves that point.

The post is only the beginning of the dialog. Let it extend in comments or across the blogosphere, but at least provide trackbacks so that you can listen and respond accordingly as well as promote the responses of those who were compelled to write based on your words.

3. The Press Release is Dead.

Trumpets please....

Press releases are not dead!

Crappy press releases should be killed off however.

There's a difference between
well-written press releases and spin, hyperbole and message filled documents that try to stuff so much garbage into one story that you have no clue what you're reading.

In fact, some of the greatest campaigns right now are including traditional releases (well-written of course), SEO press releases, and an experimental concept of releases that tell a story.

I've dedicated an entire series recently, which I still plan to continue, as to why there's value across all of the release formats - when done correctly.

4. The Social Media Release is King.

The Social Media Release is an extension to the press release strategy and can benefit the entire PR process through social channels not yet reachable by traditional release distribution methods.

I'm not a fan of the bullet points as I believe that's best served in the summary that precedes it. However, like SEO and story telling releases, a good SMR will show up in blog search engines and help reach not just bloggers, but customers as well who use those channels to find information.

Trust me when I say, you have to try it to see its unique and new value. Discussing it otherwise is pointless.

However, SMRs are not replacing traditional releases. And, just to be fair, I don't think anyone ever said they should. If they did, they're wrong.

5. It’s All About Conversation Not Messages.

This is a very explosive subject. No one speaks in messages; not you, not your friends, not your customers. Yet, marketers and PR professionals tend to start all activity with a template of messages and positioning statements that make it incredibly difficult to decipher exactly what you do and why it matters.

We're all leaders and innovators in what we do and therefore are introducing revolutionary and groundbreaking techniques to shift the paradigm with our disruptive, bleeding-edge, shiny new, and the industry's first, social media toolbox.

:)

Conversations are rooted in so many things other than intended messages that companies wish to instill. We tend to forget that this is about people.

The way I try to explain this process is to place yourself in the shoes of the very people you wish to reach. After all, you're a consumer. You have experience. You know what you're talking about. You make decisions.

There's a difference however in trying to guide a conversation and trying to control it.

Messages are inherently different than value propositions, though they shouldn't be. And while many of us have the right intentions, most slip into marketing speak and therefore pollute the very value propositions that companies wish to seed in the market.

As long as you back up from the traditional "messaging process" and think about why what you represent matters to the people you're trying to reach, specific to the market you're engaging, then you'll find that messages "can" be OK.

Why?

Because they're really, at that point, no longer messages, but benefits.

Humanize the story.



6. The Customer Controls the Relationship.

The customer is always right, right?

Nope.

Cluetrain aside, the customer doesn't control the relationship, but the customer does control their perception of what you do and say, and in turn, how they share that perception. And even more interestingly, they control the conversation in the domains and communities where they decide to start conversations.

There's a stark difference here. And, customers, especially in the realm of Social Media, are actively talking about your company, products, and competitors whether you care or even know about it.

But let me be clear, customer do not own the relationship with the company. As well, companies do not own the relationships with customers.

Relationships are based on mutual benefits.

Customer relations starts with listening. There's no way around that. It is also reinforced by talking to people across the various communities that create the overall market opportunity. They're just looking for answers, clarification, assistance, or support.

This isn't new though. Many have been doing this since the 80s by embracing user groups and online boards, the 90s with online groups such as deja, google, and Yahoo, and today within social networks and online communities.

There's a lot to learn by shifting focus from inbound to also outbound. But all of this is simply based on listening, respect, and value as a way of instilling trust.

7. Authenticity and Transparency are Immutable Truths.

What's wrong with being sincere and genuine?

If it's anything that we learn here is that companies earn the trust and loyalty they deserve. And, we've seen what happens when people feel duped by companies who don't tell the truth.

Not telling the full story is very different than running a fraudulent campaign. Both run a strong risk of generating anger and revolt within the community.

What "we're" supposed to be saying is just be more human in thinking about what your customer wants and why. This isn't new because of Social Media either. The only thing that's new are the social tools we can use to reach people. The premise should always be about helping people make decisions.

I have to vehemently disagree with your example of CEOs who use ghostwriters and people who rely on speech writers to put words in their mouth. This has been a point onf discontent for so long its not even worth digging up.

No one is putting a gun to their head and telling CEOs to blog. If you don't want to do it, then don't. The world's probably better off without it. And if there are consultants out there trying to force their hand at blogging, then they're wrong.

But along the same lines, don't have your best friend write love letters to the person you want a relationship with because you don't have the words, or the heart, to do it yourself.

There's nothing wrong with providing a human side as long is it has a positive impact on brand loyalty.

Ghostwriting still works in many cases on the traditional side, but why even play with it in an era where people out fakes on the Social side everyday. Obviously there's a sore spot to contend with.
But there are other ways to approach this.

Many companies are empowering the "LINE" of people who would gladly wear the corporate blogging hat to write because they're passionate about what they represent.


Passion and enthusiasm are incredibly contagious and even inspiring.

I, along with countless others, will argue that PR, as a whole, never engaged at a deeper level, and that's why there are so many problems plaguing the PR industry. All I'm saying is that we should look outside of PR sometimes to find the best person within who can truly do a job beyond what most can only try to pull off.

However, these are only points of advice, not rules. Take the steps you feel comfortable with to learn.

8. Audience is a Word of the Past.



This one really has nothing to do with Social Media, but it is still a point of contention.

To imply that there is one audience is exactly the same as assuming that there is one message for everyone you want to reach. Yes, there can be many audiences.

When I refer to audience, I am trying to highlight that we're really talking about people who have different pains, needs, wants, etc., and most importantly, they go to different places for the discovery and sharing of information. They're just not lining up at any one place to hear what you have to say.

This discussion really took off after NYU's Jay Rosen wrote, "We Are the People Formerly Known as the Audience."

The idea was originally aimed at big media to remind them that the "eyeballs" that they owned or wanted to own were really not in their control and that they needed to be reminded of the fact that, "The people formerly known as the audience are simply the public made realer, less fictional, more able, less predictable."

The point that everyone should get here is that the intelligence of people can not be underestimated. Blasts are dead. Spam is dead. However, communities specific to interests are flourishing.

Rosen merely inspired me to take the concept further. It's not just about eyeballs in the media world. It's about "targets" in the world of marketing.

As I mentioned in the section about messages, there are different value propositions for different sets of customers. Social Media is only fueling the growth and importance of vertical and niche markets, each creating and sustaining dedicated and thriving communities.

They require dedicated strategies.

This particular point of reference is merely designed to get you to "think" about the very people you want to reach, because there is no one magic bullet. All we're trying to do here is add one more step to the process of figuring out our benefits specific to groups of people and where they go for their information.

When we start the process by looking one step beyond "audiences," we are able to peel back a more revealing layer to see people directly. It encourages us to strengthen our approach.


Again, it's not directive, but it is a helpful point to help expand the ways to reach people - because that's what it's about, people.

9. Lack of Comments Means Lack of Influence.

No argument here. However, links and trackbacks are indicative of influence and reach.

OK, so that's it.

Chip mentioned a key point. None of this is edict and he's right. Most of it will help you jump in if you at least think about the stuff that's out there.

But, jumping doesn't mean you have to drink the punch, forget about your own beliefs, and cannonball into the pool with other Social Media zealots.

Take baby steps. Learn from others. Apply your experience. But do try, your way...based on the research and experience of the good, the bad, and the ugly.

But remember this, there is still a point of caution everyone must take before engaging in Social Media. Rules or not, optimism or defiance, marketers aren't welcome as is. All of these discussions over the last several years have been designed to help you learn about why what you represent matters to the very people you're trying to reach.

Use the writing of others as guidance, not as rules.

Just know what you're talking about, why it matters to each group of people, and be helpful...that's a great place to start.

Connect with me on Twitter, Jaiku, Pownce or Facebook.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Experiments in Social Media – Part I



Jonathan Crow of ThinkFree recently conducted what he calls The Great Social Experiment where he tested and practiced the art of online social networking as a strategy for helping his company join the conversation across popular online communities and in turn, evaluate the business implications for doing so.

Crow assembled a
roundtable of those active in the Social Media landscape to offer feedback, commentary, constructive criticism, and advice for the good of all marketing.

Those joining the conversation are Chris
Brogan, Aaron Brazell, Cathryn Hrudicka, Doug Haslam, and me.

Before you read below, make sure to first read, “
The Art and Science of Social Media and Community Relations.”

Question One (Well 1a, 1b, 1c):

1a-Did I devote enough time to the exercise?

1b-More to the point, where should social networking be placed in terms of marketing priorities?

1c-Does this change for companies that are more or less mature?

Honestly, Jonathan did not invest enough time, effort and sincerity in his quest to cultivate meaningful relationships within each community of not just peers, but also users. His experiment, while ambitious, was spread way too thin, only allowing for a superficial interaction with very little value for him and also the people who participate in the communities in which he wished to reach.

Jonathan has a full plate of marketing activities to run and therefore can’t be everywhere at the same time. This challenge is common throughout marketing departments everywhere. This is why businesses are starting to consider hiring fulltime community “managers” or build community teams to dedicate the required time and resources to cultivate relationships online.

The development of friendships must be based on something meaningful, interaction, basically invested in, before a community can give back. It’s just the nature of things.

What’s the intent? What value do you bring? What’s the goal for participating?

Social Media requires cultivation and a genuine desire to help those around you. It’s more aligned with
Customer Service than marketing I would say.

I’ve always believed, among
others, that Social Media shares many principles and beliefs with anthropology. Any in-the-field engagement requires a "holistic" view, observation, and complete understanding based on a "four-field" approach, Biological, Socio-cultural, Linguistic, and Archaeology. Of course, not everything applies, but it’s pretty close.

There’s much to learn from approaching Social Media and online communities from this foundation because it forces us to think, learn, and observe before we pretend to be part of any new culture. And the only way to truly “go native” is to spend time acclimating into the very culture you wish to join.

You have to start as a person and not as a marketer in order to fully appreciate your surroundings. It requires immersion.

In order for businesses to understand Social Media, it requires a strategy, goals, metrics, and a tactical plan. It all starts with answering one simple question, “Why do we want to participate?”

Is it about trends?

Is your competition devouring customer mindshare?

Is it a new avenue for sales?

Or, is it because you wish to bring value to communities and increase customer service and loyalty?

Should you even be here?

It all starts with why and what you expect to get out of the engagement that helps define how to participate.

The next step is to listen and answer the following questions.

Where are your customers?

Where are your competitors?

Where do key words take you?

Are there conversations taking place about your company, products, and if so, where?

At that point, and only at this point, can you answer the question of where Social Media fits into a company’s marketing hierarchy – regardless of maturity.

But everything comes down to the investment made into each community. You get out of it what you put into it. And, in the era of Social Media, companies will earn the relationships that they deserve.

Click here to read the responses from the entire roundtable.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

The Art and Science of Social Media and Community Relations

This post is in memory of Marc Orchant, an amazing friend, father, and geek, whom I will miss dearly. Marc was supposed to participate in this discussion. His unexpected passing has us all devastated. Our prayers and support are with his family.



Social networking, and social media specifically, have been painted as the new marketing landscape for businesses to engage with their communities of customers wherever they congregate.

In my view, we’re starting to hit a ceiling of discussion versus execution and practicality.

I believe that we’ve theorized enough. There is certainly no shortage of “experts” who can point to “why” Social Media should work for business and improved communications, however, there IS a shortage of people showing others “exactly” how to do it, how to measure it specifically, and which tools of the trade work most effectively for individual campaigns.

It’s time to divide the market of Social Media experts so that we can grow as a group of doers, not just thinkers.

While I will always look to the future to help others evolve, I will also share what I learn and what it means to PR, marketing, sales, and business branding. This way the information can be analyzed and redeployed within – specific to the goals and culture of the company and the team.

Jonathan Crow of ThinkFree recently conducted “The Great Social Experiment” where he tested and practiced the art of social networking as a strategy for helping his company join the conversation and in turn, evaluate its business implications for doing so. The goal was to examine whether his engagement would increase both ThinkFree’s and his professional network, gain market intelligence both on product as well as the industry as a whole, and expand the company’s market outreach.

Basically, Crow, like many other marketing professionals, are trying to find out how Social Media can help businesses grow and whether or not conversations have real world business benefits. A side note, I would add, is that I wonder if his participation also affected and contributed to his personal brand.

Now, ThinkFree is an interesting company to profile because at the end of the day, it compete s against Microsoft Office, Google Docs, as well as other hot Web 2.0 companies. No easy task indeed.

ThinkFree offers an online/offline office suite that is completely compatible with MS Office. The company also created a Social Network of its own, ThinkFree Docs, which is basically a community built around discovering and sharing documents and building a network around content and content creators.

His first step was to jump in.

Crow targeted the following networks:

ThinkFree Docs
digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Pownce
Technorati
Reddit
Twitter
Jaiku
Newsvine
Flickr
Plaxo Pulse
StumbleUpon
Yahoo!360
MySpace
Friendster
LinkedIn
hi5
orkut

While some of Crow’s targets are right on, others are secondary or even tertiary for accomplishing his goals – just by knowing the culture of each community from experience. However, this is his experiment, so what he learns is important to everyone else who may or may not have jumped in yet and to what extent each community applies (or doesn’t) to their business. He represents many who are actively seeking ways to engage and/or how.

Crow points out, “It feels like I just went into a single’s bar and shouted, ‘will somebody be my friend!’”

He continues, “Who is listening and are we talking in an echo chamber? The answer has been a little mixed. Yes, I have met new people, and am having new conversations. Is it as much as I was expecting or hoping for? No. But the lesson I am taking away from this is that if you do want to build new contacts that can help you, and that you can help, it takes time. Social networks are not a magic formula...Like in the outside world, it takes time to get to know people and develop relationships that can lead to meaningful action. I guess I fell into the trap of looking at these resources as a commodification of friendship. And, we really need to break out of that mentality - myself included.”

Jonathan’s observation is perhaps one of the most common realizations of any good and optimistic marketer. And, this is exactly the point where the Social Media market and its practitioners start to fragment.

Jonathan however, is already a lot further along than most. He’s engaging and writing about his experience. He’s calling out to others to examine his participation and to offer advice, insight, and feedback so that he can engage more effectively.

Many companies and Social Media consultants dramatically underestimate the resources, time, dedication, and passion it takes to engage and cultivate relationships across multiple communities. It’s just not the same for any two networks.

However, Jonathan participated and contributed to the communities he wished to engage genuinely. He did not sit on the sidelines; he shared, learned, observed, and also emerged with real world feedback.

For example, in part three of his series, Crow discusses the different classifications of social networks he observed during his experiment and offered advice for business professionals looking to also jump in.

Aggregators
These pull together feeds from other profiles and sites, keep track of what you and your contacts are doing. Great examples of this are: Flock (as I mentioned already), Plaxo, and Pownce. Somewhat Frank has a great list.

Connectors
These sites connect people, groups, networks, make suggestions based on profile information. The best example is LinkedIn, but obviously Facebook, and MySpace.

Feeders
These sites feed data that is then used in other sites. Typically media based, examples would be YouTube, Flickr, Google Maps, iLike and ThinkFree Docs.

Publishers
These “sites” are where people come for their entertainment or information. Twitter, Jaiku, and obviously YouTube, ThinkFree Docs, Flickr, etc.

His advice:

1. Start with the sites that best do contacts.

2. Connect with others. Expand your network

3. Get your aggregator sites going.

4. Publish away. Get involved. Don’t spam!

Crow’s experiment continues and it is both a looking glass into real world obstacles and a crystal ball that will reveal where true opportunities reside and in turn, will define and shape realistic expectations and associated metrics.



Crow summarized, “In the end my expectation of social networking bringing thousands of friends and generating enormous buzz was obviously misplaced. What I found is that it requires just as much effort (maybe even more) as blogging, newsletters, and traditional PR tools (such as email;), but as a marketing manager you need your company to be included in the conversation wherever that conversation occurs. Increasingly those conversations are happening in social networks. It is not an either or proposition. You have to go through traditional channels and these new tools.”

Jonathan is not alone. He has many peers who are wondering what to do and to evaluate if their engagement is on track.

He believes that there’s something in this story for everyone, and I think he’s right.

Therefore, Crow has created a roundtable of those active in the Social Media landscape to offer feedback, commentary, constructive criticism, and advice for the good of all marketing. Those joining the conversation are Chris Brogan, Aaron Brazell, Cathryn Hrudicka, Doug Haslam, and me.

The discussion will be based on several questions posed by Jonathan:

1. Did I devote enough time to the exercise? More to the point, where should social networking be placed in terms of marketing priorities? Does this change for companies that are more or less mature?

2. How should we be judging the outcomes from social networking activities? Are there tools you recommend?

3. Is social networking the right tool for the tests I created? Are my expectations of social networking in line with what it can do? What is social networking best geared to address?

4. How much of getting social networking to work is the contacts you bring with you? How aggressive should one be in reaching out to new contacts? Should I, for instance, try to befriend Chris Anderson even after I have composed a note meant to appeal to what he is interested in?

5. How can I build better mechanisms into the framework to increase feedback?

You can follow the conversation here.

Connect with me on Twitter, Jaiku, Pownce or Facebook.