Modern Public Relations was born in the early 1900s, although history traces the its roots and origins of practice back to the 17th century. Two years ago, the press release celebrated its 100-year anniversary.
While the communications industry has iterated with every new technological advancement over the last century, including broadcast mediums and Web 1.0, none however, have forced complete transparency prior to the proliferation of the Read/Write Web aka The Social Web aka Web 2.0.
It is this element of fundamental transparency of Social Media combined with its sheer expansiveness and overwhelming potential that is both alarming and inspiring PR professionals everywhere. At the minimum, it’s sparking new dialogue, questions, education, innovation, and also forcing the renaissance of the aging business of PR itself.
While some are already predicting the death of PR, I fundamentally believe that it’s simply the death of PR as we know it. As long as communications professionals want to learn and improve their craft, then we are positioned for evolution. No matter how much we think we know, we’re now equalized as an industry in order to reset, learn, and define and earn an invaluable role within the business cycle – again.
Contrary to popular belief, Social Media isn’t killing PR, but the business of PR IS in a state of paramount crisis. It’s not without merit however. Perhaps up until now, we have been our own worst enemy.
The Social Web, the democratization of content and the wisdom of the crowds is merely amplifying PR’s weaknesses and expediting the declination of a broken business model. As is, many of us are collectively contributing to its perceived insignificance and irrelevance.
But there’s hope and that hope is you...
Our future lies in our ability to shift PR from a business of publicity to a regiment of true “Public” Relations.
Abbreviating "PR" truncates the value of our role in one of the greatest transformations the communications industry has ever witnessed.
As good friend Nicole Jordan told me over dinner in NY recently, “PR stands for Press Release, not Public Relations. When people ask me what I do, I tell them that I’m in integrated communications – public relations today is about much more than press releases and pitching and I am so much more than just a PR person.”
Indeed. Just ask any executive what comes to mind when you say “PR” and note the common misperception shared by many decision makers.
The brutally honest responses, whether you agree or not, will represent more than we’d care to know or acknowledge. The assessments and responses will most likely span from “publicist” to “networker” to “press release” to some fallaciously degrading and sexist stereotypes of what PR people are, how they act, and what they look like. You’ll also summon war stories and bad experiences with PR people and agencies that unfortunately continue to reinforce the current state of PR crisis for the PR industry in general.
There are reasons we are where we are and unfortunately, the PR industry hasn’t hired a crisis communications team to alter or steer perception based on the industry-leading and groundbreaking work, results, and pioneering efforts of many.
Let's be honest. At one point or another, we as communications professionals HAVE contributed to this state of crisis.
Yes, I’m speaking directly to you.
I hold the mirror up as I comb through my professional endeavors.
I too am guilty of hitting send on spam blast emails and broadcasting “messages” at “audiences.” I have also contacted reporters without reading their work. I have been blinded by quantity, not quality. And, I have sacrificed the investment in relationships for the gamble of percentages, hoping to turn big campaigns into measurable pockets of coverage and visibility. My career, in the beginning, was defined by hits and coverage and whether those articles and stories were "on message."
Since the mid 90s and with the dawn of Internet, I’ve dedicated myself to not only reinventing how I practice public relations, but also sharing my experiences, successes, stumbles, and failures with others who care to learn and improve a global industry from the inside out.
To this day, I remain continually, focused on investing in positive, constructive, and highly detailed blueprints on how we, as a communications industry, must embrace the socialization of the Web to transcend the foundation and very essence of PR into a more meaningful, relevant, and lasting renaissance.
Social Media symbolizes a crossroads for public relations representing the decision we, as individuals, face in our career. In one direction, we can adopt the transparency and the expertise necessary to genuinely and sincerely connect directly with our customers, peers and the influencers who advise them. In the other direction, we can continue relying on hyperbole and jargon filled press releases for coverage, spamming targets with irrelevant information, maintaining a superficial and shallow knowledge of the products and industries we represent, and maintaining distant and removed relations with those we wish to cover our stories.
In 2007, I shared a heartfelt conversation with my good friend Tom Foremski, where we outlined the state of PR and also what was required in order to lead and also survive the transition to the new era of marketing communications. His observation was best distilled with a blunt and poignant statement, "PR won't change, until it has to.”
As long as PR agencies and consultants are profitable as is, why would they reinvent themselves?
As some of us are learning, not challenging the status quo, especially in this economy, is the most direct path to oblivion...unfortunately, many are learning of the perils of "doing this wrong" through public exposure in a very global town square.
Contemporaneously, other communications professionals or organizations are rushing to capitalize on the new gold rush by adding everything "social" to their menu of services, mission, and experience, misrepresenting the very premise of their ebbing capabilities to masquerade inexperience in an exaggerated cloak of proficiency and expertise. Even in the face of intense competition to own the conversation, agencies are simply folding in new “social” services governed by the same top-down processes that govern day-to-day traditional PR. It’s a survival vs. adaption philosophy.
United as an industry that is dangerously slow to heed repeated dire warnings and adopt new standards, we will fail. Divided as individuals hungry for education and advancement aligned with those thought leaders and proven practitioners of new communications, we can collectively assemble a new and powerful collective of streetwise revolutionaries who will effectively transform, magnify, and upgrade the infrastructure of PR.
As much as you hear that all of this advice is Marketing 101, the marketing infrastructure is actually designed to function counter-intuitively. Intention and execution are distances separated by reality. We speak through hyperbole, spin, specifications, statements, and top-down messages. We continue to broadcast these disconnected campaigns in an era when our intended recipients have “opted out” of any outreach that pushes an agenda on faceless audiences through unemotional voices without recognizing the people formerly known as the audience (thank you Jay Rosen).
Personal vs. Corporate Branding
Don’t limit your expertise to personal experience with the use of social tools and networks. Your credibility, reputation, and knowledge must represent your command of them in action, both successes and failures in real world b2b, b2c, and p2p (peer to peer) engagement – not simply based on your efforts tied to personal branding. It’s one thing to build a community around you and your online persona, it’s altogether something different and much more complex and sophisticated, to create and inspire an active and passionate community around a product, service, and ultimately a brand.
With the powerful undercurrent of Social Media surrounding our personal and professional activity, we are now brand managers, not only for the companies we represent, but also our personal brands and reputations as well. If you’re not proactively shaping and cultivating it, who is?
We are our own brand managers now, responsible for how our personal brand and reputation as well as those we represent, are perceived, embraced and promoted. We learn through listening and participation. There is no excuse for our complacency as the failure in today’s landscape is public, searchable, and enduring.
Traditional PR and marketing is on the endangered species list and this is that moment in time when its fate is in the hands of those who are contributing to its evolution or its demise. The veritable problem is that those who are instrumental in its downfall are oblivious to it. Everything is reactive, based on economics or negative responses that threaten their position in the market.
However, Social Media is not our golden ticket. It is both an opportunity and a privilege.
Applying the old rules and methodologies of communications to the new world of parallel influence only expedites the irrelevance and resentment of public relations and marketers overall.
Some PR teams and agencies are attacking the evolving business of PR by hiring thought leaders and injecting them into an existing infrastructure that’s complicated by years of hurdles, broken lines of communication, politics, and a misaligned hierarchy that prevents the most qualified individuals from leading and participating in successful online engagement for the long term. At best, most everything is viewed as a "campaign."
Other brands and PR teams are also attempting to rally posts, articles and tweets by paying or giving away products in exchange for coverage and good will. The practice has already earned the attention of the FTC and they’re issuing guidelines to ensure that bloggers and now Twitterers disclose the fact that they’re paid, whether with money or products.
Even after highly influential journalists and bloggers such as Chris Anderson and Gina Trapani have published the names of individual PR 'un' professionals and organizations that they consider spammers, we still actively push our messages to anyone and everyone as if we are determined to destroy any hope and potential of success - all in the name of scoring that one hit that will earn accolades and erase all of our wrongs.
Are we not more than publicists, handlers or even worse, spammers?
Why are the most junior people within any organization maintaining direct dialogue with leading influencers within their industry?
PR has entrenched itself in a top-down model that places strategy and direction at the top, management in the middle, and execution at the bottom. In a sense, many organizations are putting its most inexperienced and unseasoned employees on the front lines of PR while guiding them with strategy based on previous experience and/or theory, which may or may not be outdated and ineffective in today’s diverse and potentially perilous communications climate.
Things move too quickly to not combine experience, strategy, and execution in one role.
With the new and pivotal opportunity presented by Social Media, we again, are mistakenly and unfortunately, applying the same methodologies to program planning and engagement.
Social Media didn’t “invent” conversations and it did notunearth online conversations either; nor did it provide, for the first time, platforms for consumers to share their thoughts, opinions, and advice. Online groups and opinion sites existed since Web 1.0. And, before that, bulletin boards and forums hosted online discussions.
Contrary to popular belief, there are actually relatively few “Social Media Experts.”
As I’ve said many times, the ability to master any subject that moves, adapts, transforms, and evolves so quickly is beyond mastering – at least for now. We are, for now, simply its dedicated students.
Even still, several Social Media experts are predominately selling strategy and consulting because right now, everyone is buying it. Unfortunately, they’re helping companies understand the mechanics of Social Media tools and “conversations,” showcasing and promoting capabilities, functionality, and also providing training, but still delegating the execution to more junior marketing professionals, including interns and students. Most of this is rooted in theory as instead of experience.
Again, why would we entrust our most important outreach and engagement to those who most likely have no bearing on the real life needs, pains, challenges, and choices of those we’re hoping to compel? Yet, they are the very teams we’re sending out to represent our brand each and every day. And expert guidance from the top doesn’t translate company-wide unless they’re part of the day-to-day team demonstrating and teaching through example.
So, when a blogstorm or Tweetquake erupts, who’s really to blame?
Do we condemn the less seasoned employees who are simply executing based on “expert” instruction or lack thereof? Do we hold leaders accountable because they’re the masterminds behind most outreach? Or, is executive management liable simply because their expectations are out of synchronicity with reality?
The answer is all of the above.
However, PR and social marketers will point to account managers because of their unattainable and out of touch presumptions. Senior level managers will charge those who fail with incompetence. Those on the front lines will charge their management with leading through ineptitude, but they still sign the checks.
With the radical changes underway in the communications and media spheres, we need to not only retrofit PR and marketing with new techniques and strategies, but reconstruct its entire model for the Social Web, accounting for the complex and elaborate two-way layers of traditional and new influencers and the communities that form around them and the ideas they represent.
We just have to reinvent how we structure, monetize, and capitalize on the opportunities that are ripe for the entire industry of qualified communications professionals.
Relationships Aren’t Built by Copying and Pasting Content
We’re not as far as you’d like to think. Here are two very recent and real examples of pitches that I’ve received:
Dear Brian, I love your blog. I read it all the time. You really are a thought leader on this front. Because of that, I have something that I think is really worth your time. We're launching a new social network for plants where people can share their recommendations and experiences and also comment on each other’s green thumbs. We are also introducing a new plant monitoring application that lets you know via gmail and text when you need to water or feed your plants.
I don’t write about plants. But just because I’ve written about “social networks” doesn’t necessarily mean I would ever cover a social network for plants.
Then there are also those PR people who are moving way too fast for their own benefit:
Hi Liz, I love reading GigaOM. CUT AND PASTE PITCH HERE.
That’s right. I’m not Liz and I don’t yet write for GigaOm. However, every day, I, along with every reporter and blogger out there, receive a significant number of shotgun aka “spray and pray” emails that are produced from pure mail merge factories, , intro text, , . Or, for those who manually create each email, it's the same process. But when we're moving too fast, we tend to slip and forget to change the contact name every now and then.
Slow down.
You’re contributing to the atrophy of our profession. This is exactly the moment when we need to realize that we can offer more to the company we represent and the people we’re trying to reach.
Rather than trying to satisfy quotas, realize that the PR and marketing industries are undergoing an incredible metamorphosis, one that implores a "less is more" strategy, rooted in the connectedness of real people. In the era of the Social Web, a few key posts and articles in the right places, supported by an impassioned community bound by evangelism, success is significantly more profound, and immediately measurable. New PR suddenly starts to pave a clear and effective new path for day-to-day engagement for those who are ready to learn, mature and excel.
PR is So Much More than Media, Analyst and Blogger Relations
The business of PR slowly evolved away from public interaction and eventually transformed into a mechanism of media, analyst, and blogger relations to instill messages and attempt to manipulate public behavior.
PR = Publicity
This view of PR can be traced all the way back to Edward Bernays in the early 1900s. A nephew of Sigmund Freud, Bernays’ experimented with Freud’s ideology related to people's unconscious, psychological motivations and how they could be exploited or steered through communications and top-down influence. As a result, PR of today is more aligned with Media, Analyst and Blogger relations and not necessarily “Public” Relations.
Now that the creation and distribution of content has been democratized, everyday people are earning a level of authority that fundamentally works against the current model of current PR.
As described in my book with Deirdre Breakenridge, “Putting the Public Relations,” the Web, heightened with the proliferation of the read/write Web and the impending semantic Web, is forcing the integration of the “Public” back into Public Relations.
Applying the current process of pitch development and distribution has little to no impact on your numbers and your potential to survive the evolution of communications. In fact, this process works against you by alienating you and the brands you represent, closing valuable inroads to reach the very people who can make or break your business.
By simply adding bloggers to your mail merge or your “hit” lists, you are not adapting to the new landscape of influence and engagement, only contributing to its state of crisis. Bloggers are people too, and their in boxes are just as chaotic as those of their journalist counterparts.
Social Media is bigger than simply integrating a Blogger Relations branch to your PR strategy. It’s an opportunity to engage directly customers and peers who either purchase or recommend the decisions of others. Engaging and inspiring these individuals requires new techniques, methodologies, and an undeniable understanding of who they write for and why they should care about what you represent.
The new world of influence demands customer empathy, evangelism, passion, expertise, and knowledge – everything else is disposable and takes away from your focus and potential.
Doc Searls spotlighted the people who define our audience on the other side of our messaging megaphones to magnify the reality that markets are conversations and that there really is no discernible market for our pitches and messages.
Over the years, my experience with direct engagement has revealed that conversations are also markets - within vertical segments. Traditional word of mouth, at the consumer level, is intensified as impassioned individuals now have access to new mediums that directly and indirectly influence the decisions of their peers in the real world and through their extended communities online.
So how does PR attempt to engage with these new influencers?
Other than pitching at them and broadcasting messages through any and all channels and networks, many PR people attempt to either pose as “users” or offer boilerplate comments and reviews across the blogosphere, in micromedia communities, online groups and social profiles and review sites. This isn’t participation. This is PR of old. It embodies the same spin that defines most press releases along with the disingenuous voices associated with ghost-written executive quotes, contributed articles and now blog posts.
Listen, engage, prioritize, and grow in the communities that affect your development, reputation, relationships and authority as a person and as a professional. It's the only way...
Listening is the fundamental characteristic that separates the experts from the theorists.
The process of actively observing and documenting relevant conversations not only enables the communications team to create an accurate social map of important and relevant networks, but it also produces a more informed and empathetic assembly of sincere, humanized evangelists and ambassadors. This is a critical observation and lesson. We emerge from the process of listening and internalizing in tune and in touch with our markets and the people who define and direct them.
Blasting messages to them now seems trivial and purposeless. Engaging, solving problems, and answering questions, essentially becoming community and customer resources becomes paramount and natural. We participate as consumers and ultimately as the customers we wish to reach. It fuses customer service and influence. As next generation communications professionals, we're walking a tightrope between earning attention and building community, without losing sight of our ultimate goal of propagating our value propositions.
It is the job of any good Public Relations professional to identify and guide influential voices within important online communities.
Transparency Begets Authenticity; Experience Engenders Authority, and Influence
Transparency scares the sh!t out of PR people. This is an industry that has long operated behind the puppet master’s curtain, pulling the strings for spokespeople and varying communications tools to broadcast content at, around, and through the back channel of influence, but never directly connecting with the people who define its audiences.
The democratization of content also dictates the success, “shareability,” and permeation of your story by revealing and refining it through public forums and channels – let the community guide how you approach them.
The Social Web forces you to participate as an individual, not as a marketer and thus requires a new depth of understanding, expertise, knowledge in order to establigh a meaningful relationship between customers, influencers, and the company and products you represent.
Whether you post a comment, write a blog post, upload a video, create a profile on a social network, or establish groups or fan pages, everything is now open to public dissemination, interpretation, and response. Email too, long considered a safe medium for exchanging or presenting information, is now backfiring for PR, fueling bloggers and media to respond with a deep-seeded necessity to seek retribution by posting of original pitches and creating public blacklists that absolutely devastate PR individuals and their standing within their respective industries. While I don’t agree with public humiliation, it is an unfortunate reality that we must contend with while fighting and promoting the ethics of human relationships. Nonetheless, the lesson here is that we are now forced to change how we approach people with our stories. It's for our own good and the overall betterment of our craft.
A New Business Model and Infrastructure for Public Relations
At South by Southwest (SXSW) in March 2009, Erin Portman, Karly Hand, Peter Shankman and I participated in a highly anticipated and heavily attended session entitled, “Are PR Agencies Dead?”
Some people would object to the use of “dead” in the title of anything these days. But, is it really a tired discussion in the grand scheme of things? Maybe, it’s stale to those who ping pong the discussion in the echo chamber. But for the rest of the world, it’s a topic that is either new or soon to be introduced into their world.
The controversial session explored whether or not Social Media was killing PR or breathing new life into it. In the end, it’s actually a bit of both. And, along with it, Social Media is forcing the establishment of new business models, staffing infrastructures, and service portfolios.
To be clear, the practice of blindly broadcasting messages through poorly written press releases at audiences is dead. PR is NOT necessarily dead, but without the application of a social tourniquet, it is bleeding to death.
Essentially, this is a matter of livelihood and the evolution of marketing and PR is incredibly poignant to each and every one of us.
At the end of the day, we are now in the business of visibility, influence and perception management. So, we can now put away the white coats associated with spin doctoring. We can remove the blindfolds we wore in every mass blast we sent. And, we can hang up our plaid jackets associated with the snake oil salesmanship we were accused of oozing in every exchange.
We now need to rethink our roles as intermediaries between the companies we represent, authorities, and ultimately the communities that determine our place in the market. In order to persevere and excel, agencies, and the individuals who define them, must act as thought leaders and market makers, serving both sides of the conversation and also the ensuing activity and interaction.
The business model of billing for hours as related to press release writing, account management, news pitching, and traditional counseling is growing increasingly irrelevant in the face of new services and competition that PR never saw coming.
Suddenly we’re competing against interactive, advertising and digital agencies, community management teams, social media agencies, experiential specialists, branding and marketing consultants, or hybrid organizations combining all of the above.
Honestly, up until this point, we weren’t hired or paid, by in large, to connect, advocate, influence or believe, we were rewarded by the placements that result from mass pitching. When you run a campaign around “hits,” then it’s crafted and governed by numbers, not people.
As I mentioned during the panel, the public relations/new media agency that I run no longer bills for press release writing, account management, or standard pitching. These are now functions of more relevant social + traditional outreach and engagement programs. In fact over the last decade, we’ve completely redesigned our services infrastructure to reflect the real world business needs and goals of the companies we represent. It’s not absolutely definitive, but a promising work in progress that is very monetizable now and in the long-term. However, it requires not only new and conclusive services that combine standard communications and new media strategies, but also the associated metrics that justify the newer activity. In order to balance the new programming, we also shifted our billable infrastructure from a top-down agency model to a flat organization consisting of experts in the fields we represent as well as those who are fluent in the tools, channels and supporting cultures that foster influencer and customer interaction. Basically, we detonated the old infrastructure, kept the pieces that have and will always work, and connected everything to the new programs where we’re already seeing value today.
Ctrl-Alt-Del
There is no doubt in my mind that eventually all PR agencies and consultants will follow suit and transform from publicity firms into New Media communications and marketing organizations rich with in house or contracted content producers, digital sociologists, research librarians, community managers, digital architects, connectors, and industry experts/strategists.
But everything hinges on the ability to interpret trends, assess value and metrics, intelligently engage, and ultimately inspire change through proven results.
The function of socializing media within the organization could be relegated to a team of dedicated specialists before its deployed company or agency wide.
Real-Time Responsibilities (fully transparent and disclosed) of a New Media team could include:
Content Producers - Creates content necessary for client/company interaction with customers, peers and influencers, including videos, images, Web pages, blog posts, policies and guidelines, tweets, wikis, comments, online experiences, profiles, etc. In many cases, connectors and industry experts/strategists wear this hat and assign the creation of important content to either content producers, other members on the team with direct experience, or simply produce it themselves.
Digital Sociologists - Observes the cultures, trends, behavior, associated with communities, networks, forums and compares the interactivity around keywords and brands to contribute to engagement strategies, customer service policies and improvements and product modifications.
Digital Ethnographers - Ethnography is the branch of anthropology that deals with the scientific description of specific human cultures. For those projects where a deep study of online culture and communities is critical, an ethnographer is ideal for documenting a descriptive study of a particular human society. As ethnography is based almost entirely on fieldwork, this role usually lives and interacts with the people who are the subject of study.
Research Librarians - Complements or augments in house or contract sociologists by analyzing relevant keywords used by customers, listening to and documenting conversations by content and sentiment, charting volume and frequency within social networks, identification and analysis of true influencers and tastemakers across media, blogs, and social communities, and presents data and charts for analysis by strategists.
Community Managers - Listens to conversations in social networks, forums, and the blogosphere documented by research librarians or through their own process, assigns relevant dialogue to appropriate team leads, manages the workflow and response status, and in most cases is the first line of response.
Digital or Social Architects - Digital or social architects are responsible for building the online bridges between company brand and consumers via widgets, sites, online dashboards, blogs, social newsrooms, social media releases, wikis, social networks, fan pages, forums, groups, and any other application, platform, or group responsible for hosting content, conversations, and interactivity.
Connectors - Informed individuals and teams that can connect stories to influencers and inspire activity, direction, and conversations. Connectors act based on intelligence, empathy, sincerity and the ability to truly “bridge” a story to someone else in a way that’s specific and compelling to them as an individual and also as it relates to their audience and social graph.
Industry Experts/Strategists - Someone has to act as the conductor to this all star orchestra. Qualified individuals have mastered the art and science of attaching new and traditional media to the bottom line of their business and also possess a deep understanding of and experience with customer empathy, market trends, and the governing technology that connects the people within desired market places.
Yes, I said customer empathy...
As I said in the SXSW panel, which the Los Angeles Times picked up, "Get a little empathy going on. Putting an ear to the virtual ground will tell you everything you need to know -- it's going to affect and influence what you write, how you talk. It's going to make you a little more passionate, a little more believable."
These new, adjoined job functions create a new level of services that complement existing, traditional and necessary communications activities.
- Listening/Monitoring/Documenting – intelligence gathering and trend analysis
- Engagement in the networks and groups where relevant conversations are pervasive and warrant participation
- Content creation
- Conversation management and trafficking
- Influencer and tastemaker identification and networking
- Community management, empowerment, and cultivation
- Event hosting and franchising
- Story development and connectivity to “The Magic Middle” bloggers and Long Tail networks
- Humanizing company and product messaging and redefining the online journey and experience associated with the online presences associated with specific brand/products
The opportunities are limited only by the imagination of those responsible for engendering change from within.
Becoming the People You Want to Reach
In a recent survey conducted by the Institute for PR, most (92% - up from 89% in 2008) of those surveyed believe that blogs and social media influences news coverage in the traditional media (newspapers, magazines, radio and television). It most certainly influences the purchase decisions of customers.
But how do you spark word of mouth across the social web? How do you socialize relevant information across the social graphs of those who define your relevant networks?
Communities won’t react to a press release. Nor will communications professionals galvanize action because of a generic pitch.
They need inspiration and motivation and that can only stem from an interaction that is so compelling and engaging that they’re inspired to act and share. Essentially you have to become the people you wish to reach and excite.
Yes, transparency subjects you to public scrutiny. It also forces you to rethink your approach and the words you share with those you believe are qualified and amenable to hear them. It raises the bar and hopefully inspires a more personal and human interpretation tied to the nuances of the individuals you’re attempting to convince and inspirit.
When we start writing that pitch or crafting the first draft of the press release, we seem to lose touch with our inner consumer in favor of appeasing corporate management. But ultimately who are we writing for?
It’s a delicate line to traverse.
On one side of the equation, you serve the people that ensure you have a job; on the other side, you’re faced with a discerning group of influencers and ultimately people who communicate through experiences, pains and benefits and not hyperbole and innovations.
It’s as simple as this, stop speaking through pitch emails and press releases designed to satisfy the people who most likely don't or won't buy the product or service.
Do you really think that speaking in marketing tongues is what it takes to get someone to pay attention to you - especially in this attention economy?
If you talked to your friends and family the way you pitch reporters and bloggers, you’d get nowhere quickly. In fact, you’d lose face and favor. The same is true for Public Relations. You’re talking to real people, on their terms.
You are the customer.
Try starting with the #twitpitch. Based on the art of MicroPR, if you could summarize the story in 140 characters or less, then you’re well on your way to commanding the escalator pitch, which makes the elevator pitch seem like a luxury.
Yes this technique reverses the traditional inverted pyramid we’re so accustomed to using when writing any marketing material, particularly press releases.
But now, we can say more with less. It’s the poetry and power of brevity - the art of persuasion through sincerity and relevance.
Here’s an interesting story I thought I’d share...
I’m working with a company that set me straight at the beginning of our relationship. While he had heard nothing but wonderful things about my team, he simply said, don’t sell me. I understand that you can get us in the press and the blogosphere and increase the frequency of conversations related to us across social networks. But I need you and your team, to be “us.” We created this product and company with our life’s passion and I don’t need it pitched, I need it shared as a real solution for those with real pain as someone who truly lives and breathes it. I don’t want PR, I need a dedicated team of enthusiasts that not only get it, but represent its incarnation.
His request is not unique.
Our Future and Your Place Within It Rests is in Your Hands
After a decade of sharing new philosophies, techniques, tools, and strategies for evolving how we think about and practice new and traditional communications, it's become quite clear to me that an industry firmly settled in history and process will not change in unison. It will take the influence of globally dispersed beacons representing a new hope for Public Relations who will champion the change from within and also from the outside. These individuals reside in PR, but will also feature the emergence of collaborators and new competitors representing hybrids of Interactive and Web Marketing, Customer Service, Technical and Social Architecture, Digital Sociology and Research, Evangelists, and Community Catalysts.
This higher level of commitment and supporting tactics are the minimum ante to practice Public Relations today and tomorrow – and its minimum will continually increase over time (as it should have all along). Personalized value and genuine, transparent and meaningful conversations is what it takes to forge relationships and continued value, listening, and sustained benefits combined with a lot of YOU, is the emotional investment that nurtures loyalty and referrals.
As mentioned earlier, PR and marketing will not change until it has to...now, there’s no choice. PR is broken, but it is far from dead. The good news is that tomorrow's public relations strategies are already successfully practiced today. The architects of new communications are collaboratively building a bridge to the masses to help navigate a path to education and relevance, defining the future of public relations and socially aware marketing in the process.
Change is imminent and its traction and fate is tied to you.
If it's one moral that I want you to embody after reading this paper, it's that YOU, and only you, are in control of your career and the ensuing success that you earn and deserve.
You have to become the very people you’re trying to reach in order to effectively create connections and inspire action. Execution is defined by engagement, earned relationships, and the ensuing activity that results from each interaction. You are involved at every point.
If you’re dedicated and resolved to learn, new thinking, case studies, education and insight are now a commodity on the Web. Everyone in this space is willing to help you, so take full advantage of it.
You learn, grow, and excel on your terms.
We ARE becoming the new influencers and therefore we must redesign the communications ecosystem in which we operate and our roles within it in order to change, grow, and thrive.
Welcome to the new standard of Public Relations and Marketing Communications.
How will you contribute to its evolution and practice?
Are we seeing the Twitterverse through rose colored glasses?
In January 2009 I pondered whether or not Twitter was a viable conversation platform. After all, Twitter is one of the darlings of Social Media and it is conversations and the democratization of content that fuel the rapid expansion and adoption of social tools and services.
Just ask any social media "expert" and they'll tell you that you must absolutely establish a Twitter account and commence the process of responding to everyone who Tweets about your company, market, or competition. But the more I observe interaction on social networks, and in the this case Twitter, I believe that sometimes it's effective to also maintain a presence simply by reading, listening, and sharing relevant and timely information without yet having to directly respond to each and every tweet - perhaps replying to only the critical or influential individuals that may need immediate information or direction to steer strategic activity.
Before you react, continue reading. Observations are just that, but there are numbers now surfacing that continue to reinforce my examination.
As Twitter continues to elicit discussions on its cultural and interpersonal impact, in-depth analysis reveals that perhaps Twitter isn't currently a pervasive platform for hosting conversations at all. And as Nielsen suggests, with only a 40% retention rate, it may not be growing as fast as we believe either. As a comparison, during the important stages of defining growth for MySpace and Facebook, retention averaged 70%.
Yet everywhere you turn, Twitter is regarded as the catalyst for people flocking to engage in the proverbial "conversation" that is so vital to fostering vibrant online communities between peers and also brands and consumers.
At a micro level, Twitter is indeed significant. The unique, loyal, and revolutionary culture and behavior it's inducing may well ignite macro reverberations that ultimately effect how we discover, share, and consumer information. In the long-term, it will at the very least, influence human interaction, business services, information dissemination, events, and also media in general. Just in the past week, Twitter was Time Magazine's cover story "How Twitter Will Change the Way We Live." Sports Illustrated also documented how Twitter is "Rapidly Changing the Face of Sports."
This (r)evolution will take time to cross the bell curve of adoption however.
Comscore recently reported that in April, 32 million people around the world visited Twitter.com, sending the micro-community surging past NYTimes.com, Digg, and LinkedIn.
Indeed, statistical exploration indicates Twitter is growing in prominence. But, perhaps its importance, at this moment in time, is more closely aligned with a powerful, new, and seemingly engaging one-way broadcasting ecosystem rather than a two-way dialogue channel we initially suspected.
As observed in a recent Harvard Business Report, the top 10% of prolific Twitter users accounted for over 90% of tweets. In correlation, the top 10% of users in other typical social networks account for 30% of all content production. Harvard crystallizes the gravity of this metric though a parallel comparison of Twitter and Wikipedia, "To put Twitter in perspective, consider an unlikely analogue - Wikipedia. There, the top 15% of the most prolific editors account for 90% of Wikipedia's edits."
The Harvard study also noted that among Twitter users, the median number of lifetime tweets per user is "one." This equates to over half of Twitter users tweeting less than once every ~74 days.
According to an analysis of seven million Twitter accounts conducted by Purewire and presented to TechCrunch, 80% of Twitter accounts have fewer than 10 followers and 30% have zero followers. Purewire documented Twitter activity by number of followers, followings, and Tweets:
Followers Accounts with 0 followers: 29.4% Accounts with 1 to 9 followers: 50.9% Accounts with 10 or more followers: 19.7%
Followings Accounts following 0 people: 24.4% Accounts following 1 to 9 people: 43.4% Accounts following 10 or more people: 32.2%
Tweets Accounts with 0 Tweets: 37.1% Accounts with 1 to 9 Tweets: 41.0% Accounts with more 10 or more Tweets: 21.9%
As TechCrunch notes, 1/4 of all Twitter accounts are not following anybody and more than 1/3 have not posted a single Tweet. Of active accounts, which PureWire defines as those possessing more than 10 followers, 10 followings, and 10 tweets, 63.6% follower more people than they have followers and only 2.8% maintain an equal number of followers and followings.
This is not unlike content production and consumption behavioral patters across the Social Web however. Looking at Forrester's 2008 Technographics data, a vast majority of people are merely spectators with less than one quarter actively publishing any content anywhere.
Forrester also segments online engagement and participation by analyzing the actions of individuals who populate the Social Web. They're labeled as Creators, Critics, Collectors, Joiners, Spectators, Inactives.
Right now, Twitter and its potential for progress is limited only by the information, direction, and education provided by Twitter itself in order to demonstrate and teach existing and new users how to truly use and take advantage of this new and dynamic information ecosystem. While Twitter's API is empowering third-party developers to create Twitterverse of exciting, useful, and entertaining applications that enhance the Twitter experience, it can not outsource nor rely upon the community to teach the world how to use Twitter. Providing recommendations on people to follow doesn't really help at all.
In the meantime, Twitter will continue to flourish as a rapid-fire broadcast network until people learn how to communicate, understand how to participate and what to contribute, and eventually ease into a collaborative, two-way meaningful dialogue that represents Twitter's greatest promise.
Is Twitter Evolving from the Facebook to the Myspace of Microblogs? Analyzing Twitter trends and demographics
When I attended TWTRCON in San Francisco and also the 140 Twitter Conference in Mountain View recently, the intent of businesses was perspicuous. Speakers and attendees were on hand to actively share, inquire, and learn about how to increase visibility, engagement, and brand presence on Twitter and other social networks.
Equally paramount was the division of those who believe they’re already successful on Twitter and those who have yet to discern measurable value for the long-term.
The consensus defined engagement as a way to join the conversations that were transpiring around their brands – with or without them. The need to not “miss out” and also attempt to steer perception was critical and pervasive. For the majority, ROI would come later.
In one example of ROI, where the I = investment, @delloutlet reported $1 million in sales directly to the company’s activity on Twitter.
In many other examples of ROI, where the I = involvement, companies including @jetblue, @southwest, @carlsjr, @ciscosystems all reported dramatic increases in customer engagement, which led to the creation of vibrant online communities rich with empowered brand ambassadors.
In the Twitterverse, this is about businesses attempting to get down to business.
At TWTRCON, I received a printed summary of a Twitter trends report published by ThinkTank research and strategy. I found it rather interesting. In fact, it was so interesting, that I decided to retype the data to share with you, with full attribution to its author Robin Boyar of course.
Why is it so interesting?
I believe that this report may signal the end of the innovators and early adopters segment of Twitter adoption and the beginning of the era for the early market majority.
It’s more than a hunch and less than scientific, but I’ve continually observed and documented the Twitter Trending Topics prior to the great race to Twitter’s (ir)relevance leading up to the present. In addition to Twitters incredible growth as reported yesterday, there are scores of hints that the older age groups responsible for Twitter’s rise are now rivaled by an increasingly younger demographic that is responsible for sparking some of these interesting and obvious “mainstream” trends. Remember, when Ashton took on CNN, it created a series of copycat contests that included the likes of Britney Spears, Will Smith, Spencer Pratt and many others who reach a much different market segment. This rush of new users were introduced to Twitter from a much different psychological perspective than how Twitter was initially embraced and utilized by early adopters. Whether they stay or not is an entirely different story however.
Two of many, many recent examples:
Whereas Twitter launched as the Facebook of microblogs or micronetworks, it may now shift into a cultural fusion of Facebook and MySpace. And if this is indeed the case, it will fundamentally change the behavior, interaction, customs, habits, and trends within this highly scrutinized societal microcosm.
Perhaps brands will need to rely on digital anthropologists and sociologists in addition to socially aware marketing strategists in order to effectively navigate the shifting currents on Twitter – today and tomorrow. In the end, it's about capturing and grasping attention and injecting value in order to engender loyalty and empower communities.
Compare these thoughts with your personal observations and the data included in the report below and let me know what you think is unfolding and whether it’s a positive evolution and how it affects your participation – if at all.
This information is from ThinkTank’s “Engaging Users,” a study of Internet, mobile, and social networking users, fielded May 2009. For more information, please contact Robin Boya, robin [at] thinktank8 [dot] com.
Twitter User Summary: Current Twitter users are early adopters of technology, entertainment and emerging services. They are more likely to use social networks and Internet 2.0 technologies to stay connected and be informed. Most are eager to learn about new products and services. They are loyal users, with 70% likely to continue using Twitter. As such, Twitterers leverage the power of word of mouth and are a valuable audience.
Twitter users are super engaged consumers. A typical twitterer is a technical or creative professional in their 30s, who tends to adopt new products or trends more quickly than others. Almost all are on other social networks, 2/3 watch online video, read blogs, and play video games. Over half have HDTV, 40% have DVRs, and about 1/3 have smartphones.
Consider it the Oprah effect – most of the U.S. knows about Twitter. Over ¾ of Internet users are aware of Twitter. While friends (43%) have driven greatest awareness, a whopping 35% heard about Twitter through television. Other sources of awareness include Websites (22%), social networks (18%) and family (17%).
What does Dr. Horrible, coffee, Tom’s Shoes, and a Sony Vaio have in common? They were all purchased because of Twitter. 40% of Twitter users regularly search for products or services online via Twitter. About 20% follow at least one product or service. Specifically, 12% note they’ve chosen a service or bought a product because of information they got on Twitter.
Is the social networking and Twitter phenomena half empty or half full? It depends on the user. While 44% believe Twitter has long term value, 52% believe it’s a trend.
Brands beware! Use Twitter wisely! 40% of Twitter users note the way a brand utilizes Twitter affects their perception of the brand. 2/3 of users would use Twitter to communicate good or bad information about a brand.
Make social networkers loyal: cues from Twitter: easy, fast, and well designed. Social networkers note community and friends as top reasons they’re spending more time on these sites - variety of activities (46%), ease (39%), and speed (30%).
Search and find most popular, multimedia not fully adopted About 1/2 of all Twitterers are using search and find. Less than 1/4 are updating to blogs, posting photos or posting videos.
Ashton vs. CNN: News actually trumps celebrities. About 1/2 of Twitterers are interested in news and entertainment. Other popular Twitter themes include politics, products and services, sports, celebrities, and restaurants.
Social networks and Twitter: It’s not just about finding your old prom date. 2/3 of all social networkers use them to connect and communicate. However about 1/4 use them to follow news, play games or professionally network.
Smartphones: A Twitterer’s best friend. Twitterers are almost twice as likely to own smartphones than Internet users. Top two phones include BlackBerry (15%) and iPhone (10%). Twitter users have advanced mobile behavior: 1/2 take photos, 1/3 go online and 20% play games regularly. About 25% of Twitter users update some type of social networking status regularly via their mobile phone.
Time Spent on Twitter Soars by Over 3,700%, Facebook up 700%
I just read an interesting report published by Nielsen that examines time spent on multiple Social and Micro Networks. The study compares total minutes in April 2009 compared to April 2008. The results are not as much surprising as they are revealing.
According to Nielsen, total minutes spent on social networking sites has increased 83 percent year-over-year. Twitter, the social media darling that can never seem to satisfy our insatiable appetite for all things orbiting the Twitterverse, experienced extraordinary growth in the last year with total time spent up by over 3,700%. While currently ranked 5th, Twitter's dramatic groundswell is the most notable on the list followed by Tagged.com, a five year old social network that experienced a 1,000% year over year increase in engagement.
Time spent on Facebook, the popular network that now boasts a $10 billion valuation, increased nearly 700 percent year-over-year, growing from 1.7 billion minutes in April 2008 to 13.9 billion in April 2009.
MySpace clocked in at a very distant second place with just under 5 billion minutes. Out of 10 companies on the list, MySpace is one of the only two that showed a decline in time spent. From 2008 - 2009, time spent on MySpace is down 31% and Gaia Online also saw a 17% reduction.
Other notable entries include My Yearbook (up 105%) and LinkedIn (up 69%). What is unclear to me however, is the inclusion of Blogger and LiveJournal in this report. While technically each serve as a network, the overall usage of the services is related mainly to their publishing aspects and less on their inter-personal connectivity.
Top 10 Social Networking and Blog Sites Ranked by Total Minutes for April 2009 and Their Year-over-Year Percent Growth (U.S., Home and Work)
Nielsen also observed the defining age groups for these popular social networks. Visitors aged 25 to 34 and 35 to 49 were the highest indexing age groups on Facebook, representing 27 percent and 23 percent as more likely to visit the site than the average user, respectively. The highest indexing demographics on Myspace.com, in contrast, were those aged 18 to 24 and 12 to 17.
Perhaps Twitter's surge symbolizes the disparity between popularity and adoption. Yes, the service is on the rise and it's influencing popular culture and how we communicate with each other in the process. But, the real star of this analysis is Facebook.
However, as our attention continues to thin as we're introduced to new content, people, networks, and shiny new apps, even the most popular communities are not infallible.
While attending TWTRCON in San Francisco, I was immersed in dialogue with Steve Rubel, Paul Boutin, and David Berlind. The discussion centered on history versus sociology and psychology, hinging on the idea that any given network's "15-minutes" of fame (read: popularity and importance, not lifespan) translated into roughly five years. Remember the days of Friendster's dominance and MySpace's invulnerability?
If you subscribe to Zuckerberg's Law, then you believe that people will share twice as much information online year over year. His idea suggests that as we embrace the social web as a greater society, our comfort levels will ease and succumb to the activity of our peers, encouraging us to share increasing volumes of personal and professional content online. But, that isn't relegated to just Facebook, that could be true for all social networks.
What if the rate in which popular social networks innovate and earn prominence actually decreased over time instead of hovering at a five year benchmark? The introduction of new and arresting networks and tools is only going to continue to multiply and intensify. We have yet to truly taste mobile networking or find the killer app for the living room. Competition for our attention is escalating and it's just a matter of time until our experimentation officially leads to distributed and uncommitted presences. Perhaps this will lead to a series of strategic acquisitions to prolong prestige, relevance, and stature.
I suggested that the rate in which our attention is focused is both diminishing and extending during this period of increasingly socialized interactivity. Meaning, how we adopt, communicate, share, discover, and observe within social networks is ultimately uncertain and still in the process of definition and documentation. We're writing the book as we go...much of this is so new, we have yet to see the balance, individual adoption and sustainable activity, and long-term effect.
The excitement of having tools that allow us to instantly connect with people who share in passions, interests, and contacts all over the world combined with the psychological impact of this new genre of personal "micro" fame is seductive and not necessarily in alignment with how we will eventually fold these tools and ensuing behavior into our day-to-day cadence.
The reality is that our friends and networks of influence determine our location and participation. This is a competition not for popularity, but for you and your time and loyalty This is indeed, the Social Economy.
Twitter connects people through a rich and active exchange of ideas, thoughts, observations, and interests in one, highly collaborative and promising ecosystem. The Twitterverse advances micro interaction and connections through an expanding network of applications, engendering the potential for macro reach and resonance online and IRL (in real life).
Following the recent debut of The Conversation Prism v2.0, Jesse Thomas (@jess3) and I proudly introduce an alpha version of The Twitterverse. While the landscape for Twitter approaches 1,000 different applications, this map visually charts the important tools to help communications, service, marketing, and community professionals more effectively navigate, engage, analyze and measure participation on Twitter.
Please share suggestions, additions, or changes in the Flickr comments section. We'll integrate the feedback into the next rev of the Twitterverse and release formally as a poster and a downloadable high-res graphic.
In the eyes of imaginative and opportunistic advertisers and marketers, bloggers and online influencers are the new celebrities and athletes. Brands are showering them with endorsement deals rich with products, cash, trips, exclusive access to information, and VIP treatment each and every day, creating a new genre of star spokespersons.
Many expert and lifestyle “citizen” bloggers and online weblebrities are creating communities around their persona as they freely and actively share personal and identifiable experiences online, in social networks and also in the real world. Those who can successfully connect their stories to others in and around their peer groups earn trust, visibility and authority – limited only by ambition and ingenuity. They’re rewarded for their presence and ability to point their followers in strategic directions.
These new brand ambassadors are almost the perfect instruments for surreptitiously sparking and cultivating groundswell within desired and vital target markets.
Consumers look to experts and trusted peers for guidance and insight when making decisions.
Who’s to say that the information they’re receiving from their trusted sources is indeed truthful and honest, if they’re unaware that these authorities are actually directly or indirectly compensated for their opinions and insights.
Journalists and reporters on the other hand, most of them anyway, are held to strict editorial guidelines and policies that denounce the practice of receiving products, gifts or compensation in exchange for editorial coverage. There’s at least, a line that separates ethical press from advertorials – whether it’s crossed, is another story.
But in the new online world of citizen influence, there’s no line on the horizon – at least not yet. Driven only by loosely defined and sporadically practiced methodologies that promote at-will disclosure and transparency, many brands, intentionally or deliberately, are blurring a consumer’s ability to discern the distinction between partisan and genuine experiences.
But that’s all about to change. Under new guidelines proposed by the Federal Trade Commission, brands and/or bloggers may be held liable should either the FTC or scorned consumers deem that the actions or claims misguided their decision and/or misrepresented actual performance or efficacy.
According to the Federal Trade Commission, the ability for a consumer to exercise better judgment and common sense is indefensible when a glaring absence of disclosure is pervasive.
Earlier this year, The FTC published recommendations to update its guidelines concerning the use of endorsements and testimonials in advertising and public relations. A new set of guidelines, enforceable by the FTC Act, is due soon.
The Guides, 16 C.F.R. Part 255, are designed to assist businesses and others in conforming their endorsement and testimonial advertising practices to the requirements of Section 5 of the FTC Act. The Guides interpret laws administered by the Commission and therefore are advisory in nature. However, proceedings to enforce the requirements of law can be brought under the FTC Act. The Commission would have the responsibility of proving that a particular use of an endorsement or testimonial was deceptive.
In its review of the proposed guidelines, BusinessWeek observed, “The world's more ambitious bloggers like to call themselves 'citizen journalists.' The government is trying to make sure these heralds don't turn into citizen advertisers.”
I disagree with BusinessWeek’s observation and so does the FTC.
In a discussion with Mary Engle, the acting deputy director for the Bureau of Consumer Protection, she articulated, “It’s not about preventing citizen journalists from becoming citizen advertisers, that’s just not true. We’re acting to ensure that bloggers don’t create a bias in the consumer decision-making process. Consumers just need to know that what they’re reading is technically an advertisement.”
Whether the post is compensated with cash or with free product or rewards, the FTC views them equally. Engle observed, “The real test is whether or not the consumer’s impression or decision would change if they knew the post was sponsored.”
It’s about responsibility and credibility.
But honestly, why chance it?
This is about building credibility and earned relationships through engagement and empowerment for both company/product brands and personal brands.
The FTC Guides advise that an advertisement employing a consumer endorsement on a central or key attribute of a product will be interpreted as representing that the endorser’s experience is representative of what consumers will generally achieve.
Even still, the practice of paying bloggers and influencers or providing them with free products not only clouds their ability to share an impartial story, but also risks credibility and trust of brands and influencers among the very people they’re trying to inspire and galvanize.
With or without the new FTC guidelines, the practice of disclosure is not an option when the potential for significantly damaging customer relationships in a very public spotlight is at stake. Unfortunately, it’s not at the forefront of many of our marketing programs.
Free Products are Gifts that Keep on Giving
Ignorance is bliss, until it’s not...
In 2006, Microsoft introduced its Vista operating system to consumers using traditional and new media. In one of the programs, bloggers of varying levels of influence, received Acer Ferrari notebooks to potentially review and share their experiences of the OS and also the notebook. Initially, it wasn’t made clear to these bloggers that disclosure was encouraged. I saw many variations of the packages and letters. Depending on which version a blogger did or didn’t receive, instructions and intentions were also vaguely communicated. What was commonly perceived and understood by other bloggers and ultimately consumers, was that these expensive notebooks were theirs to keep whether or not they shared anything online. To say it created a blogstorm of controversy would be a gross understatement. The lessons learned here served as precedent for those seeking guidance, but didn’t necessarily translate intro industry-wide standards.
Brands view the practice of sending products to bloggers and online influencers as a natural extension of their product PR campaign. In many cases over the years, companies simply didn’t expect to receive product back from reviewers, whether or not they were employed by a publication bound by editorial guidelines against the acceptance of gifts or free products. Bloggers and online influencers, until the recent FTC attention, were viewed no different.
Sending free products, according to the FTC, is viewed as compensation, which translates into an advertisement or paid endorsement. The FTC pays attention to products of "significant" value.
Under the FTC guidelines, disclosure is required in any case where the brand is hopeful of obtaining a published review of the product, when its return, either explicitly or implicitly conveyed, is not expected. This attempts to ensure the protection of all parties against liability or legal action.
Sponsored Posts and Conversations
Whether or not disclosure is evident and forthright, the question really is, whether or not the practice of giving gifts to encourage reviews or outright paying for them is ultimately effective and sound for channeling influence, community building and revenue generation for the long-term.
We’re now talking about outright paying for posts and conversations versus simply sending free product or rewarding them with various incentives and hoping for complimentary posts and discussions in exchange.
A recent report published by Forrester Research defines sponsored conversations as, “A marketing technique in which marketers provide financial or material compensation to bloggers in exchange for their posting blog content about a brand.”
In the report, which is available for $749, Forrester recommends adding sponsored conversations to the corporate marketing toolbox, “Sponsored conversation is controversial; many bloggers believe it threatens bloggers’ reputation for independence. But we think this practice is here to stay. Why? Because bloggers want to get paid and marketers want to pay them.”
According to the FTC guidelines, if there were a financial or other relationship between the advertiser and the endorser that would affect the credibility of the endorsement, that relationship would have to be disclosed under Section 255.5. So, as long as the blogger is clear that the post or conversation is “sponsored,” all guidelines are respected and satisfied.
Wait, what about the brand?
Just because bloggers want to get paid and brands want to pay them, doesn’t make this a no-brainer business practice does it? Or, better yet, does it actually enhance the product/company brand or the personal brand of the blogger in the long run?
Some of the biggest brands in the world are already experimenting with paid posts including, 1-800Flowers, Black&Decker, Cold Stone Creamery, Dell, Disney, MTV, Sears, Sony Pictures, and TiVo. For example, Kmart recently sent several high profile bloggers on $500 shopping sprees in exchange for “sponsored posts” about their experiences.
I suppose, it’s in the way that you use it...
So, let’s examine something of deeper impact and consequence. Every community thrives on interaction rooted in respect and defined by credibility and trust – at least that’s the way it’s supposed to work.
For bloggers to risk or leverage their existing, and more importantly, potential credibility in exchange for blogola is either absurd or simply gratifying and motivating for now. Maybe the bigger picture has yet to come into focus for many bloggers and the act of recognition is enough. And, for brands to either take generations of brand integrity or shape its new and emerging identification on the backs of bloggers who’ll loan their stature and reputation is either brilliantly forward-looking or foolishly shortsighted. In the end, it’s the consumer who holds the power to decide their degree of affinity and affiliation or mutiny and backlash.
Integrity and Reputation vs. Buzz and Google Juice
The more I write about this subject, the clearer my focus. The impending FTC guidelines and whether or not bloggers and brands are at risk of legal punishment isn’t the issue. We just have to deal with it. We can choose as consumers whether or not we want to engage with this content.
The real discussion should center on why a company or blogger should even care to participate. The things we do for money are governed by personal boundaries. As individuals, we define those lines and how clearly we wish to view and abide by them.
If we examine Forrester’s case for sponsored conversations, we’re essentially fueling word of mouth by paying for authorities to share their views about our company or product brand in their domain. This is important. We’re talking about paying for people to write about a company or product on their existing, personally-branded content platform associated with it’s already existing, captive audience. This theoretically sparks Webwide buzz that connects a brand to the community of would be customers who rely upon these personalities and voices in the blogosphere to make informed decisions.
Seems simple enough, except two things are going to prevent this from effectively promoting the sponsoring brand over time – 1) disclosures read like warning signs; 2) There are reports that claimGoogle is downgrading the PageRank of select blogs or sites that actively publish paid content and violate Google's Guidelines.
Google Software Engineer Matt Cutts recently weighed in on the subject again. He commented on Jeremiah Owyang's blog post on sponsored conversations, "Clear disclosure of sponsorship is critical, and that includes disclosure for search engines. If link in a paid post would affect search engines, that link should not pass PageRank (e.g. by using the nofollow attribute). Google — and other search engines — do take action which can include demoting sites that sell links that pass PageRank, for example."
In a followup post on Matt's blog entitled, Paid posts should not affect search engines, he states, "My bottom-line recommendation is simple: paid posts should not pass PageRank. We do take the subject of paid posts seriously and take action on them."
And, in an interview with Eric Enge, Cutts reminded us that this is about providing disclosure for readers and search engines alike, "Google has made its policies pretty clear on paid posts, about the fact that they should be disclosed not only for humans, but also for machines. Because, it is machine readable disclosure and you are not selling links to past PageRank."
I bet many of you reading this now are responsible for the direction, visibility, and perception of a brand. So as brand managers, you are what the market says you are, tethered by the credibility and stature of the people who collectively voice their thoughts (paid and unpaid.) In the world of pay-per-posts or sponsored conversations, brand association starts to portray a picture of guilt by association, not necessarily the building of strategic brand presence or resonance.
This is a deeper discussion of reputation and trustworthiness versus funding word of mouth buzz and viral marketing. To simply state that “disclosure” alleviates and resolves all risks involved with sponsoring conversations trivializes the discussion.
Brand Ambassadors and Inspired Communities
Whether we like it or not, many new service providers are offering brokered services to facilitate “pay to play” campaigns in Social Media. Concurrently, many brands are also running these programs from within.
Clearly a balance scale exists where integrity and paid buzz are on opposite sides. So the real question is, how do you leverage the laws of perception management in your favor? One way to do so is through traditional, people and solutions-focused public relations.
Identify target bloggers and work genuinely with them on developing a meaningful story that helps and informs their community. This is a necessary program in of itself and it cannot be underestimated. However, if you must pay for sponsored conversations, then consider shifting away from the pay-per-post model of blogger-hosted advertorials and explore other options.
Obviously paid endorsements work when the platform for conveying paid messages is understood and accepted. Celebrities have effectively pushed products in commercials without tarnishing their brand for decades. Essentially, the difference is the forums and networks in which these paid messages appear.
While the value of having a dedicated paid post about your product directly in the influential domain of your target bloggers, look to the existing business of paid endorsements to build and manage a campaign that effectively reaches and compels potential customers without the negative attributes that cling to per-per-posts.
Essentially, hiring or recruiting influential Weblebrities and online experts is not unlike the model for linking real world celebrities to brands through commercials, events, appearances, or other dedicated vehicles to promote the alliance and the story. These campaigns, when concepted and executed properly, effectively link the product/company brand to the celebrity’s persona and prestige to convey a relationship that connects to consumers through aspirations, affinity and emotions.
So in the emerging and highly influential world of Social Media, it only makes sense to create dedicated campaigns and supporting online residences to showcase these strategic alliances and relationships. Essentially, we’re taking the “sponsored conversation” away from the host blogs and moving the potential for influence into a dedicated domain that naturally appeals to customers in ways that complement the behavior and compliance for viewing, interacting with, and potentially absorbing sponsored messages and endoresement. This levels and equalizes the campaign and the ensuing experience, while protecting, shaping, and promoting brands on both sides.
The idea is to create and host a two-way street that still inspires word of mouth and viral marketing, whether it’s funded by cash, rewards, or simply affiliation and recognition. And it just might also offer the best of both worlds, as the blogger or online personality will most likely share their experiences and involvement in their communities anyway.
For example:
Mozy hired iJustine as an official spokesperson airing content on Mozy.com as well as across multiple social networks including YouTube and iJustine branded properties.
Wal-Mart established Elevenmoms, an expert group of independent bloggers who receive free sample products to review and then freely choose which products to review based entirely on their personal opinion and experience.
Based on the company’s successful foray into influencer relations with its Flex loaner program, Ford is currently initiating a consumer groundswell for its impending launch of the Ford Fiesta by enlisting every day consumers to share their experiences online and in social networks.
In the end, sponsored conversations will continue to receive funding, as brands remain tempted by low hanging fruit. That’s the reason why it’s called low hanging fruit after all. Anyone can pick it. So, establish a program that harnesses the reach and influence that is rife throughout the social web and incite a more calculated and valuable response.
The FTC is simply striving for truth in advertising. Perhaps in Social Media, there also needs to be a bit more value, dialogue, sincerity, and empowerment in the relationships we invest in and promote whether they’re subsidized with monetary compensation or recognition and affiliation.
The point is that when establishing a paid Social Media campaign, anything that is less than clear, honest, or actively contributing back to the bottom line of the business and/or brand resonance is actually taking away from it.
The press release is over 100 years old and for the most part, its evolution wass mostly stagnant for the majority of its lifespan. However, the press release has evolved more in the last decade than it has over the century thanks to the proliferation of the Internet and most notably, the Social Web. The tired and oft disregarded press release is finally tasting reinvention as it transforms to chase the new channels of influence as well as adapt to the rapidly shifting behavior of content discovery, consumption and sharing.
We are witnessing the modernization of an aging communications tool and the distribution networks that connect them to the outside world of influencers and consumers. While the Web is serving as the catalyst for this regeneration, we can also look at innovating the template for traditional press releases as well, starting with the very documents and HTML pages on existing corporate newsrooms that serve as their primary source of PR and corporate presentation.
It’s about time we breathe new life into the press release template.
Over the past few years I have been a vocal supporter and committed practitioner of Social Media Releases (SMR) because they offered the ability to share stories in a more palatable and meaningful format, supported by the media content that helped reporters and bloggers retell the story using the media building blocks that contextually framed it. Social Media Releases also served as a hub for connecting disparate media elements across multiple social networks serving as a frame of reference for distributed videos on YouTube, pictures on Flickr, supporting documentation on DocStoc, market reports and information bookmarked on Delicious, etc. SMRs represent a new and promising opportunity to renew the dialog around improving the foundation for the communication of news, information, and events that left most immune to its overdue potential.
Sometimes in order to embrace innovation we need to blend it with existing methodologies and processes (what we know and how we do it) to eventually propel change, technology and comprehension across the bell curve of adoption.
As you know, I’m a strong proponent for change, where change is merited. It must serve a purpose and not associate with hype or shiny objects. In an online world, where both media and communications are altering how content is produced and distributed, the information we share and how we share it must match the correlating workflow and production processes. At a minimum, they must align with the reader’s persuasion, provide the tools and services they need to retell your story their way (links, video, images, bookmarks, etc.), and also provide a mechanism for inviting feedback, and also encourage sharing through a myriad of services that sends information across the social graphs.
Web 1.0 spurred the modernization of the press release, the first in a series of innovations that continue today and represented the most significant changes to the standard format since the introduction of audio and video news releases (VNRs) serving the broadcast industries.
In 1997, BusinessWire debuted the Smart News Release, which offered businesses ability to integrate links to supporting audio, video, and digital images. BusinessWire also hosted the release online to complement its wire counterpart. According to the company Dell and AMD were among the first adopters of this new release format.
In 2001, PRNewswire released its MultiVu multimedia release (MMR) service, which also offered a branded, stylish online dashboard for businesses to tell their story through text and corresponding media. The first multimedia release published using MultiVu introduced the movie Pearl Harbor and featured stills, clips, and other media files to create a more immersive experience.
Soon thereafter, all existing and also new breeds of wire services, including PRWeb, BusinessWire, MarketWire, among others, debuted online multimedia friendly press release hosting solutions that adapted to the Web’s migration from 1.0 to 2.0.
In 2006, Todd Defren introduced us to the concept of a Social Media Release, which connected online media to social networks. To this day, Todd and I continue to collaborate on the advancement of the Social Media Release in conjunction with many visionaries across the communications and Web marketing communities.
Shortly thereafter, Shannon Whitley developed PRX, the first automated system for building and distributing Social Media Releases.
Last year, PitchEngine launched a dedicated service to empower PR to create, host, and publish branded Social Media Releases and Social Media Newsrooms without the help of developers or Web marketers. I since joined the company as an advisor and stakeholder.
Recently, MindTouch debuted a powerful wiki-based mashup platform and application for automatically creating affordable, custom, and hosted Social Media Releases and Newsrooms for SMBs and enterprise organizations. This was the first service that provided IT and Web marketing with the tools necessary to socialize static releases and newsrooms without changing the hierarchal process of Web site and content management systems.
One of the easiest solutions to deploy and manage online press releases are also the least discussed and most underestimated. Blogs represent some of the most effective platforms for communicating solutions and offering answers to the community of customers and prospects seeking insight. It’s the most profound forum for actively demonstrating expertise and sharing vision and direction consistently over time. Blogs are also an ideal home for sharing news in a format that tells a story in a more human voice. It shouldn’t read as a typical release however. It should capture the essence of what’s new, unique, and worthy of attention and present it in a format that mirrors the story you would ultimately hope to read elsewhere – complete with all of the shareable media content that also speaks to people, their way.
Renovating the Methodologies and Voices for Press Releases
As I said earlier, in order to successfully embrace a new way of communicating news, existing processes and approval cycles must influence the desired evolution – step by step.
Tools, networks and services are facilitating and simplifying the system for creating and distributing new media releases. But most of the time, they start in Microsoft Word or another standard word processor before they’re transmitted to wire and hosting services or published to the existing corporate news page.
Everything starts with the existing template that we use from previous releases, which usually forces us to fill in the blanks in a way that prevents and discourages artistry, ingenuity, value, and believability to flourish. Press releases, in this case, are merely “cookie cutter” productions that usually read as such.
We attack the creation of press releases the wrong way.
First, we have to ask ourselves a question, “Who are we writing for?” In most cases, the answer is not the very influencers or consumers we wish to reach, but the product and management teams that will grant us approval to issue the release. We usually don’t speak the way a press release reads. In fact, I’d argue that we’d never speak to a customer in that language or tenor in real life, so why are press releases less informational and more self-serving...
What if we empathized with the customers we wished to inspire and adapted the story to their channels influence based on the preferences and focus of the authoritative voices that reach them?
It might change the way we approach a blank slate.
And, what if you had to write the headline in 140 characters to convey the value of your news to someone on Twitter? Better yet...what if you distilled the essence into 120 characters encouraging retweets of your story.
It very might modify what and how the rest of the story unfolds.
In order for new media releases to work, they have to receive support representative of an entirely new methodology for communicating stories. It’s not anything new. Corporate executives, spokespersons and marketing and sales professionals have long faced the challenge of refining the value proposition into a compelling elevator or better yet, an escalator pitch.
The idea of the escalator pitch is game changing and powered by the brevity that takes place on Twitter, Facebook, FriendFeed and other micro blogs every minute of every day. It inspires us to embrace brevity and relevance outside of these communities, in the real world, to help people "get" what we do and why they should care.
News flash: New media releases aren’t a new tool to package the same old marketing "speak" that form and enforce the stereotype of existing press releases. They are indeed an opportunity to improve how we, as individuals representing a company that helps real world customers, share our story with them in a way that means something.
The process of humanizing a press release also begets another game changer into the process of writing—answering the above question of to whom we’re hoping to reach. Markets are distributed and supported by mainstream and vertical segments. Not one tool, publication, blog, peer-to-peer network, or story reaches and compels them similarly. Having one press release with a general set of value propositions is necessary but also potentially limiting. Whether or not you address this in your pitch letter to varying representatives of these markets is one thing, but also think about the SEO value of distributing releases targeted directly to various customer groups who are actively looking for information on traditional search engines.
Don’t forget, an Outsell study surfaced the fact that over 51% of IT professionals report that they get their news from press releases discovered in Yahoo and Google business news searches over their top trade journals.
The press release is not simply a function of PR, but an opportunity to tell your story in a way that serves as a catalyst for influence and action, directly and indirectly. The press release thus becomes a social object, capable of sparking conversations, movement, and events.
Breathing New Life into the Existing Template for Press Releases
Improving the narrative, formula and format for press releases is obligatory regardless of supporting mechanisms and technologies. The inclusion of social media elements within the release also fortify stronger cornerstones for improving personal connections and engagement to the release, but also enabling the discoverability and sharing of the content. Having the ability to include videos, pictures, audio, all served from different social networks into one centralized story dashboard, forces us to rethink how and what we share within the story. It introduces a storyboard element that begins well before we write the first word of the release.
We effectively become storytellers and the process of press release writing now transforms into an experiential and technical production, with ROI measured not only in hits, but also release and content views, trackbacks, tweets, mashups, conversations, comments, extended sharing within individual social networks, and also the call to action we integrate into the release. Yes, we can measure and steer experiences now.
Once we move beyond the creative, storyboarding, and production process, we can tackle the creation of the press release. Because everything usually starts with good old-fashioned word processing, I’ve included a new template to visualize these new ideas. Essentially, you can “socialize” a press release simply by integrating all of the content within the release and also by adding “live” links to the content.
Ultimately the release may or may not cross a wire or garner Web visibility through services such as PitchEngine or PRWeb. They will, at the very least, attempt to earn an audience with reporters, bloggers, influencers and also prospective customers via the corporate Web site, online newsroom or via email. The originating template now also serves as a source of an organized story as well as resource for storytellers to grab media in their desired formats and also for consumers to save and share information without sending them to multiple locations.
Regardless of the new media release format you choose, for example, bullets versus prose, do start the release with keyword density in mind to improve its search engine optimization (SEO), which enhances visibility and ranking in search results. In this case, search engines will prefer that the release starts with a headline and also an introductory summary or paragraph whether or not you also include supporting bullets in the body of the release.
Following is an example of a press release document that was socialized to mirror its counterpart that crossed a traditional wire service and also received distribution and online hosting using PitchEngine. I’ve embedded a viewable and downloadable Word and PDF version below via Docstoc. It’s not unlike the Word-based template that many savvy communications professionals were utilizing in Web 1.0. It’s only gained in strength and potency over the years.
Let’s dissect this example to more effectively explain inherent advantages, design features, and overall structure of the release.
Twitter Pitch
As Stowe Boyd coined it, the TwitPitch or Twitter Pitch, is the ability to communicate the substance of the news release in 120 characters encourages us to think about the story in terms of brevity and relevance and also how what we say might also incite tweets and retweets. I dare you to not change how your release reads after running through this exercise. This is where I usually start the process of writing the entire release and not the reverse.
For those who mastered the art of pitching via email, this exercise shares the lessons learned when crafting a subject line for our messages.
Images
Word processing has significantly evolved over the decades offer desktop publishing capabilities to help communications professions transform static releases into interactive experiences. They now aesthetically mirror their online Social Media Release brethren. Visually telling a story helps place the news in context, making it approachable and potentially immersive.
We amplify value and extendibility of socialized content by linking to the images where they’re hosted as well as connecting to complete photo albums. This offers viewers the ability to reconstruct the story visually and also builds a bridge between the content where it resides as well as establishing an associated storyline with supporting information.
Allow me explain, as this applies to all other social content that potentially resides in the press release. Featuring content from flickr (insert any social content network), for example, the viewer can not only jump to a more immersive set of images, but also users in each respective content network who may find your content, can also click through from the image (or video, audio file, etc.) back to the release. Content should absolutely link back to the host release from each network in order to connect disparate media to the story hub. In the description sections for each piece of content, it’s also wise to include a summary of the news release to help boost Social Media Optimization (SMO) and also frame the story around the material they’re viewing. More on SMO below...
Cross-linking is key to building a hub of social spokes to construct a wheel concentric engagement.
Summary
Providing an encapsulated explanation of the news sets the stage for comprehension and desire to read the remainder of the story. SEO specialists will recommend that writers employ a strategic architecture of keywords (not to be overdone) in order to optimize its performance in search engine results.
When writing press releases, many of the classically trained communications professionals will remember the inverted pyramid style of leading with the most important information. Think of it as making a first impression or as writing the elevator or escalator pitch. Attention is scarce and on the verge of becoming an endangered human characteristic. You have to earn the right to capture and hold attention with each and every release you produce. Make it matter. Answer questions. Solve problems. Direct readers to solutions and beneficial information. Remember, brevity and empathy speak volumes.
Become the customer you want to reach and speak to them as a peer of influence. Don’t try to sell, hype, or deceive readers. In the era of the social Web, customers and influencers now have the ability to equally share the negative attributes of your release as well as the positive, important, and value-added benefits.
Links
Providing helpful, clickable links within the release steer the reader to valuable informational resources and pre-defined experiences only to return to the original release enlightened and knowledgeable. An important note here is to remember that wherever you proactively send your reader, where it can be controlled, should complement your story. Ensure that the destinations are consistent, articulate, easily navigable, and conducive to safeguarding a positive return trip.
Also include links to the traditional or other social media releases should they include varying angles or access to additional information.
Embed Codes
One of the structural assets of a Social Media Release or multimedia release is the seamless capacity to easily grab content (videos, images, audio players, presentations, and many other forms of helpful content) and embed it elsewhere (blog posts, tumblelogs, Web pages, social network profiles, online stories, etc.) without having to recast, record, or shoot new material based on your information. You’re making it easier for influencers to tell a good story to their audiences.
Readers simply cut and paste the embed code you provide in the release into their destination post or page to automatically include the playable/viewable media in their domain. Essentially by simply including the code, you’re making your content and story portable.
Connecting Corporate Profiles Across Social Networks
As we’ve discussed earlier, the ability to link your story to additional pictures, video, and content albums, channels or files residing in other social networks ameliorates or improves the experience to convey significance. It also introduces viewers to your individual corporate profiles in each respective network, allowing them to friend or follow your activity based on their consumption and engagement preferences, setting the foundation for community cultivation within individual and connected networks.
An important lesson here is that releases are typically viewed as isolated events, when in fact they can string together a theme or corporate libretto that is narrated with every new form of content uploaded and shared within each or all of our strategic social networks.
SMO
We briefly discussed the art and science of Social Media Optimization above. But, allow me to further clarify this practice. If you recall the Outsell study that revealed how press releases factor into customer searches for relevant information, we know that behavior is already a precedent. So, if I were to tell you that a social network was actually the second most popular search engine behind Google, optimizing social content would make perfect sense. Well indeed, this is the case.
YouTube performs more keyword searches than many popular, yet traditional search engines. Unlike keyword density exercises in SEO, SMO involves artful and poignant descriptions that feature keywords and also employs the convention of intentional and crowdsourced tagging. Tags are similar to keywords in that they describe the content directly or indirectly. When individuals search for specific content in social networks, it’s a combination of tags and keywords that unearth relevant and associated content.
By providing recommended tags and keywords, we’re also encouraging disseminators of our information to also tag and discuss our story in complementary fashions. Note: You may see “Technorati Tags” in other hosted online Social Media Release services. To put things into perspective, Technorati is the premier blog directory for indexing blogs based on areas of topics and expertise as well enabling information seekers to search keywords that connect results to authoritative blog posts. So, unless the service is hosted on a truly social platform such as a wiki, social network, or blog platform, these Technorati tags that are included in these online press releases today will most likely not appear in Technorati search results. This is one of the many reasons why hosting and managing a corporate blog is important. Just because it’s on the Web, doesn’t make it truly social.
The Social Graph
Connecting this content to the overarching corporate story is how we merge traditional to Social Media. More importantly, when influencers and customers interact with the content, their mere participation offers a reverberating effect that introduces the material to respective social graphs representing first degree friends and followers as well as potentially spreading the story to second and third degree friends of friends and so on – the proverbial social graph.
In other words, when someone bookmarks the news on delicious, “likes” or posts it on Facebook or FriendFeed, shares it on Twitter, that discrete activity is shared within one or multiple networks simultaneously for others to potentially experience. It’s this behavior and peer-to-peer implicit and explicit endorsement that sets the stage for content to potentially become viral. Peer-viewed content is usually trusted and qualified.
Feeds
Subscription feeds help influencers and customers stay up-to-date with your news. Providing RSS feeds for important product or corporate news channels or an all-inclusive OPML file enables people to effortlessly and automatically receive updates within their feed reader of choice.
Social Bookmarks
A note about social bookmarks: earlier, we outlined how people can bookmark or share your content in services such as Delicious or Diigo or in news communities such as Digg or Mixx. In PR, you can also create purpose-built pages dedicated to providing an industry overview that supports your company’s position within the marketplace. With SMO, these pages can also surface in social search to reveal your side of the story.
Issuing releases on the wire and hosting them on Social Media and Web-based news services such as PitchEngine and PRWeb, is only reaching a small percentage of your potential audiences. When we think similarly to the multitude of potential customers who represent different markets, it becomes clear that in order to reach them, we must connect with them directly where they congregate to discover and share information.
In addition to wires and Web services, PR can benefit by creating and linking to corporate profiles on content networks such as Docstoc or Scribd. Uploading related press releases, whitepapers, research papers, customer success stories, etc., combined with strategic SMO, enable people to find your information above others. And like YouTube, copies of this content are also embeddable and downloadable providing the seamless sharing and dissemination of supporting documents such as financial statements or market reports, or perhaps, the press release itself. Imagine hosting a dedicated channel of supportive written documentation.
Call to Action
One of the most compelling attributes of new media releases is the ability to direct focus and activity. Now that we've embraced the notion that the press release can also serve customers directly, why not borrow a page from the worlds of inbound marketing and advertising by integrating a "call to action" in the body of the release. Southwest Airlines experimented with direct links to discounted airfares within the release, recording $1 million in sales directly attributed to the release appearing in search. Many other companies successfully guide and rally customer activity by integrating links to "Buy It Now," "Vote," "Tell Us What You Think," or "Register Here" pages on the Web.
Wire Distribution
While releases are hosted online as they appear in the template, the wire is a different story. The embedded images and logos for social networks can't necessarily cross the "wire," since technically only text can make the journey to news desks. However, integrated links, embed codes, and keywords remain intact.
Note: for contact information, you can also include links to your Facebook or LinkedIn profiles, vcards, or any other form of social contact that effectively reaches you.
Press releases are both a mechanism for refining and distributing news and now also serve as a conduit for connecting influencers and customers to information as well as the people behind the story through social networks. Upgrading the template for the development of press releases improves the foundation for the story and the transparency, authenticity, and believability required to extend it across social networks, online press outlets, and throughout the blogosphere.
Press releases represent a privilege to share our story with others of absolute consequence. They might serve as a required form of communication and disclosure, but releases do not fundamentally guarantee an audience, coverage, nor sharing. It’s our job and our obligation to amplify, extend, and connect our stories to the communities who can benefit from the advancements and innovation that define our business.
How does this change your process for writing and distributing your next press release?
Update:PRESSfeed offers a free browser toolbar to help optimize traditional press releases for SEO.
Brian Solis is Principal of FutureWorks, an award-winning PR and New Media agency in Silicon Valley. Solis blogs at PR2.0, bub.blicio.us, and regularly contributes marketing & tech insight to industry publications. He’s a published author and an avid speaker on the topic of new marketing and engagement.
Solis is among the original thought leaders who paved the way for Social Media. He’s a co-founder of the Social Media Club and a founding member of the Media 2.0 Workgroup.
Bio here.
Brian Solis actively keynotes, moderates, and speaks at industry conferences, corporate events, and training workshops. To discuss the possibility of having him speak or provide training, please contact him directly: pr2point0 [at] gmail [dot] com
SOBCon - Chicago, May 2, 2009
Topic: Communication Networks and Competition in the SocialSphere
PRSA - Digital Impact - April 30, 2009
Keynote: Putting the Public Back in Public Relations
Inbound Marketing Summit - San Francisco, April 28, 2009
Topic: Using Outbound Communications for the New Web to Drive Exposure and Results
New Comm Forum 2009 - San Francisco, April 27, 2009
Topic: Social Media & Investor Relations – Disclosure & Other Issues
Topic: The New Organization Landscape for Marketing Communications
Girls in Tech LA - Los Angeles, April 16, 2009
Topic: The New World of PR
San Francisco State University, April 14, 2009
Topic: Putting the Public Back in Public Relations
SVASE: Startup-U - San Francisco, April 9, 2009
Topic: DIY vs. Outsourced PR & Social Media for Startups
Blog World Expo - Las Vegas, Sept. 20, 2008
Topics: Crossing the Conversation Chasm, New Media PR, & Social Media + Customer Service
Web 2.0 Expo - New York, Sept. 17, 2008
Topic: How Web 2.0 Changed Marketing and PR
PRSA T3 - New York, Sept. 11, 2008
Topic: Return on Participation: Measuring Social Media Strategies
ASAE Connecting - San Diego, CA, August 19,2008
Topic: Media Relations is Dead, Long Live Media Relations
Digital Hollywood Building Blocks - San Jose, CA, Aug 7, 2008
Topic: The Widget Economy - The Information, Advertising, Next Generation Digital Consumer Experience
Bulldog University, August 7, 2008
Topic: Supercharging Press Releases, SEO, SMO, MMO
StartUp SF - San Francisco, June 18, 2008
Topic: PR for Startups
PRSA LA - Los Angeles, June 12, 2008
Topic: Introducing Conversational Public Relations